The Reformation Study Bible is not quite the same as the Geneva Bible. My copy is actually a New King James Version of the Bible with notes which, according to Sproul, are “in the tradition of the original Geneva Bible”. I think that what Sproul means is that it attempts to adhere to the Reformed tradition of Calvin, Beza, Farel, and Knox. I do not believe that it is the Geneva Bible translation nor does it include the original notes.
You are correct.
I have both the NKJV and the ESV vesions.
Thanks
I realize it’s not the same....
....just offering an option
“I think that what Sproul means is that it attempts to adhere to the Reformed tradition of Calvin, Beza, Farel, and Knox. I do not believe that it is the Geneva Bible translation nor does it include the original notes.”
I think you are correct, thus my search. I did download a Geneva with notes to my kindle, but the formatting makes it almost impossible to read for any clarity.