Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why this election makes me hate the word ‘evangelical’
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/02/29/russell-moore-why-this-election-makes-me-hate-the-word-evangelical/ ^

Posted on 03/01/2016 6:48:33 PM PST by truthfinder9

It wasn’t even intentional on my part. I just noticed a few weeks ago that I had stopped describing myself to people as an “evangelical.” I had begun, subconsciously, to say that I am a “gospel Christian.” When I caught myself doing this, I wondered why and the answer wasn’t long in coming.

The word “evangelical” has become almost meaningless this year, and in many ways the word itself is at the moment subverting the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Part of the problem is that more secular people have for a long time misunderstood the meaning of “evangelical,” seeing us almost exclusively in terms of election-year voting blocs or our most buffoonish television personalities. That’s especially true when media don’t distinguish in election exit polls between churchgoers and those who merely self-identify as “born again” or “evangelical.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Evangelical Christian; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: election; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last

1 posted on 03/01/2016 6:48:33 PM PST by truthfinder9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; boatbums; caww; CynicalBear; daniel1212; dragonblustar; ...

ping


2 posted on 03/01/2016 6:51:42 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Whatever. Haters gonna hate.


3 posted on 03/01/2016 6:57:07 PM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

I associate the term with those huge non denominational, personality driven, urban churches with a drum set and giant screens everywhere.


4 posted on 03/01/2016 7:05:42 PM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble mined asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

“Evangelical” has become as meaningless a word as “conservative”.


5 posted on 03/01/2016 7:11:51 PM PST by pallmallman (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

my definition of evangelical is a fundamentalist or one who believes the Bible literally.


6 posted on 03/01/2016 7:12:33 PM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Just a random observation, “evangelical” used to be an adjective, and at some point became a noun.


7 posted on 03/01/2016 7:15:04 PM PST by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pallmallman

Every generation, it seems, needs to coin a term for those followers of Christ who don’t fit the stereotype of what the current descriptive word has come to mean.

Protestant worked for a while and when it became associated with liberal mainline churches, then evangelical became the descriptive word, and as you pointed out has now become meaningless.

Something will come along.

I prefer Christ follower. But it’s awkward.


8 posted on 03/01/2016 7:15:09 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ncpatriot
my definition of evangelical is a fundamentalist or one who believes the Bible literally.

That's probably the way more Christians would define it, but the world has corrupted the meaning.

9 posted on 03/01/2016 7:16:21 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Protestant or Baptist etc worked fine. The giant non denominationals with the TV screens and preachers who become minor local celebrities needed a name. They list no affiliation on the sign out front.
Evangelicals stuck as a catch all. That’s my theory.


10 posted on 03/01/2016 7:19:29 PM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble mined asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Years ago I considered myself an evangelical.

Sadly, the witness and testimony of what is known as the evangelical church has, over the last 30+ years or more, been very contrary to the character of God, the Lord Jesus. Many who call themselves evangelicals sadly are just self-righteous and religious.

I love them, and accept them in Christ. But I cannot identify with their testimony as a group. But that applies to many other named groups of Christians.

I believe we should just be known as Christians - without labels, qualifiers, or other identities......the labels only divide. Not only in the early church were believers simply known as Christians, but in every move of God in church history, those involved almost always refused to take any name but Christian. It was later that names were given to them - Baptists, Moravians, Wesleyans or Methodists, etc.

Jesus last prayer before his crucifixion, which he prayed openly before His disciples so they would catch its significance and importance, carries weight that few Christians give it. And the focus of His prayer was two-fold - heavenward, that believers might be one with Him and the Father even as they are one; and earthward - that all Christians may be one, even as Jesus is one with His Father. Why? “That the world may know that Thou didst send Me, and didst love them, even as Thou didst love Me.”

Why has our witness to the Lordship and Saviorhood of Jesus so totally failed to touch the world?

I would say it’s primarily because our witness and testmony has been mostly hollow - and Christians are more divided than any group on earth - just as Satan would want, and has worked so successfully to achieve.

On the other hand, Jesus prayer was answered. All true Christians are one (Eph. 4:1-6), and as Paul instructed, we are to PRESERVE our unity OF THE SPIRIT. WE ARE ONE IN CHRIST - IN THE SPIRIT.
You cannot preserve that which you do not have. So what we preserve is what God did in Christ, making us all one.

Only as we stand in the reality of that truth, embracing one another as brothers and sisters, with love and grace, can the world see our oneness.......

And I must ask this question: if Jesus prime burden and heart-cry just before the cross was the oneness of his children - do we give this matter the same place and priority that He did? Do we pray fervently for our oneness - as He did?


11 posted on 03/01/2016 7:22:21 PM PST by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncpatriot

Evangelicals believe in introducing the unsaved to Christ.

One can easily be evangelical without being fundamentalist.

the Amish are fundamentalists but not particularly evangelical.

The Methodist church is evangelical and not fundamentalist.


12 posted on 03/01/2016 7:24:20 PM PST by Chickensoup (Leftism is the biggest killer of citizens in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

The real truth is this: Evangelical really means that the Christian is Baptized in the Holy Ghost, with the evidence of speaking in other tongues.

Being born again is just the first step to Christianity. But, if you want the true FULL experience of knowing Christ, then speaking in other tongues is the answer.

Remember, after Jesus was crucified, was placed in a tomb, and then was resurrected, all the disciples, including Jesus’ mother (Mary), were gathered in the upper room AND ALL WERE FILLED WITH THE SPIRIT, WITH THE EVIDENCE OF SPEAKING IN OTHER TONGUES.

So, while there are many claims about the “evangelical vote”, unless those voters are speaking in other tongues, that are not “evangelical”, they are just Christians.


13 posted on 03/01/2016 7:27:54 PM PST by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
But, if you want the true FULL experience of knowing Christ, then speaking in other tongues is the answer.

Chapter and verse?

Where did Jesus teach that?

And the Holy Spirit tells us that exactly where in Scripture?

14 posted on 03/01/2016 7:31:56 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
So, while there are many claims about the “evangelical vote”, unless those voters are speaking in other tongues, that are not “evangelical”, they are just Christians.

I guess them ordinary Christians are just second class citizens then.

Not really good enough like all those tongues speakers, eh?

15 posted on 03/01/2016 7:33:33 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

There are other gifts of the Holy Spirit. And other Charismatic Gifts of the Holy Spirit.

Speaking in tongues isn’t necessarily the most important.
They are all important.


16 posted on 03/01/2016 7:35:34 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

>the Amish are fundamentalists but not particularly evangelical.

Until I learned of Amish Sheet party rituals to expand genetic diversity, I did not know how practical they really were.


17 posted on 03/01/2016 7:35:40 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Being born again is just the first step to Christianity. But, if you want the true FULL experience of knowing Christ, then speaking in other tongues is the answer.

Remember, after Jesus was crucified, was placed in a tomb, and then was resurrected, all the disciples, including Jesus’ mother (Mary), were gathered in the upper room AND ALL WERE FILLED WITH THE SPIRIT, WITH THE EVIDENCE OF SPEAKING IN OTHER TONGUES.

The speaking in tongues was foreign languages as evidenced from the passage in Acts 2.

Acts 2:8..And how is it that we each here them in our own language to which we were born?"

The gift of tongues that day was to advance the spread of the Gospel to those who did not speak Hebrew. Recall there were many people from around the eastern Mediterranean that were present that day.

The ability to speak a foreign language as guided by the Holy Spirit is not a requirement for salvation. It is not the "true" experience of knowing Christ.

It is but one of the many spiritual gifts the believer may or may not be given.

The true experience of knowing Christ is being forgiven by Him for your sins.

18 posted on 03/01/2016 7:43:27 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

That’s too bad. Being an evangelical is the best thing that ever happened to me.


19 posted on 03/01/2016 7:44:19 PM PST by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Gospel Christian. I like it.


20 posted on 03/01/2016 7:56:41 PM PST by Old Yeller (Calling Obama a POS is a major insult to S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson