Posted on 10/21/2015 1:19:35 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Pope Francis yesterday gave an address to the profoundly divided Synod on the Family in which he confirmed his plans to decentralise the Catholic Church giving local bishops conferences more freedom to work out their own solutions to the problems of divorce and homosexuality.
This is the nightmare of conservative Catholic cardinals, including unsurprisingly those in the Vatican. They thought they had a sufficient majority in the synod to stop the lifting of the ban on divorced and remarried Catholics receiving communion, or any softening on the Churchs attitude to gay couples.
But in yesterdays keynote speech, delivered as the synod enters its last week, Francis told them that the decentralisation will be imposed from above.
While deliberately referring to himself as Bishop of Rome, to underline his solidarity with local bishops everywhere (as opposed to the Roman Curia i.e., the Vatican), he invoked the power of the Supreme Pontiff to overrule mere cardinals. The synod journey culminates in listening to the Bishop of Rome, called to speak authoritatively as the Pastor and Teacher of all Christians, he said. This is more authoritarian language than I can remember Benedict XVI using as pope. It means: I call the shots. In the end, you listen to me, not the other way around.
One statement in particular horrified the conservatives. Francis told them that the sense of faith impedes the rigid separation between the Teaching Church and the Learning Church, because the flock possesses its own sense to discern the new roads that the Lord reveals to the church Meaning? We shall have to wait until the Pope delivers a final response to the synod next year.
This is such a startling development that it deserves fuller analysis once the synod is over. I was going to say once the dust has settled, but I dont expect any dust-settling in the foreseeable future at least until after the next conclave, which lots of conservative Catholics want to happen as soon as possible.
Heres why I think Franciss decentralisation wont work:
1. This is the synod at which the African church flexed its muscles. And its very conservative. Cardinal Robert Sarah from Guinea declared that the gay lobby was as much a threat to Christianity as ISIS. Sarah is Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and therefore a top-ranking curial cardinal. But in his intervention he wanted us to understand that he was speaking on behalf of nearly 200 million African Catholics. Whether he really represents them is a matter of opinion, but I doubt that many of them would dissent from the cardinals (literal) demonisation of homosexuality. NB: Sarah and other African cardinals arent saying Well never tolerate communion for the divorced and remarried etc but so long as you leave us alone, western dioceses can do their own thing. They are saying the existing prohibitions must apply to the entire Catholic Church. Sarah regards Cardinal Kaspers proposal to allow local bishops (meaning, in practice, local priests and probably divorcees themselves) to decide whether they can receive the sacrament as heretical.
2. The more liberal Synod Fathers, sensing that Pope Francis will use the papal trump card on their behalf, have all but endorsed a version of the Kasper plan and may soon allow priests to put it into practice. Archbishop Blaise Cupich of Chicago (a Francis appointee who will soon be a cardinal) gave a press conference on Friday in which he said the following about communion for the divorced and civilly remarried: [People must] come to a decision in good conscience Conscience is inviolable and we have to respect that when making decisions and Ive always done that. If by that he means that divorced Catholics can make up their own minds in good conscience about receiving the sacrament, that puts him at odds with Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York, one of the signatories of a letter also signed by senior Vatican cardinals warning the Pope that his synod could tear the church apart. Of all the routes to schism, squabbling in public about Holy Communion is the quickest.
3. Pope Francis is no longer trusted by many conservative Catholics, and the number who dont trust him has grown enormously since the synod process which I think he has gravely mismanaged began last October. Priests and lay Catholics who originally liked the man if not his liturgical style, and thought he was fundamentally conservative despite his impromptu who am I to judge?-style comments, now believe he threatens the unity of the church. Some liberals agree that disunity is inevitable but reckon the Holy Spirit has already factored that in: eventually, Africans will come to share their own compassionate impulses towards Catholics who have been forced by the turmoil of modern life to bypass church teaching on sexual behaviour. Theyre hoping for a miracle, in other words. In the meantime, they have become the new ultramontanists.
4. Its not entirely clear what the Pope means when he talks about synodality, but it certainly doesnt involve empowering the curia. By brushing aside a letter from the prefects of the Congregations of the Doctrine of the Faith, the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Secretariat for the Economy, Francis was distancing himself from the Vatican. He may not have decamped to Avignon, but his refusal to live in the papal apartments is looking more significant by the day. He has picked a fight with the Vatican and that is something popes do at their peril. Cardinals Müller, Sarah and Pell (and other important cardinals too nervous to sign the letter) see the curia as the guardian of the Magisterium, the deposit of faith. It was to preserve that deposit that St John Paul II centralised the church. Conservatives interpret Franciss speech on Saturday as a manifesto for reversing that process and, at a deeper level, marginalising the legacy of John Paul, which contains teachings hard to reconcile with the current popes agenda. So, in their eyes, Francis is taking on the greatest pope in modern history who, now that he has been canonised, is officially recognised as a supernatural presence in the life of the church. He may even be trying to change the nature of the papacy itself and during the lifetime of his predecessor, who must be wondering whether God really intended him to resign.
There are other things to say about the impact of Franciss attempted revolution on secular and religious divisions that are widening outside the church, all over the world. But thats for another time. My final thought is that, if the Pope wants to make far-reaching changes to pastoral practice, even to doctrine, then there are smarter ways of achieving this than by hosting a catastrophically divided synod and then hinting that he intends to do his own thing anyway.
Not THE Church but a church.
Schism
Being Baptist, the hierarchy and structure of the Catholic Church is puzzling and dumbfounding.
VATICAN CITY (AP) It’s now quite certain that Pope Francis’ big summit on family issues won’t endorse any changes to church doctrine on the church’s teaching about homosexuality or whether civilly remarried Catholics can receive Communion.
Thomas More died for nothing if the Pope does this.
Correction. There is only ONE truth. There is only ONE Church. The same Church recognized by historians, theologians, scholars, saints, and martyrs for nearly 1500 years before the plague of Protestantism that unleashed a torrent of heresies.
Send Michael Corleone over there
Satan has been around even longer than that.
A historical record does not a truth make. Neither does popularity.
Many popular things have been around for a long time at God hates them.
Pope Francis is now at war with the Vatican. If he wins, the Catholic Church could fall apart
A historical record does not a truth make. Neither does popularity.
Many popular things have been around for a long time and God hates them.
Wow . . how sad that you can bash your fellow Americans’ Faith in such a harsh fashion. You sound more like a Liberal than a Conservative.
He wants a one world religion.
To unite the Christians he’s going for unity with Anglicans and liberal protestant churches. So he’s changing the Catholic religion to fit into the liberal “Christian” mold with divorce and homosexuality.
He degraded Jesus from the Son of God who rose from the dead, to a man who failed on the cross in order to remove the main difference with Islam. In Islam they molest boys so the homosexuality and pedophilia won’t bother them on a deeper, secret level.
He moved towards the atheists by saying God is not a magician in creating earth...He used evolution. He removed the other foundation of Christianity (where we believe as Jesus said, that no one gets to the Father, except through Him) when the pope said, anyone can get to heaven if they follow their own conscience - even atheists.
He’s said that anyone who disagrees with him is of Satan; demonizing anyone of the true faith. He’s bad news.
See my post at #17 on this thread. I explained what I think Francis is doing to get a one world religion which is what he wants.
The Church will not fall apart. There would be a schism, which has happened before in the history of the Catholic Church, and it has always landed on its feet.
Nope
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.