From: Jonah 4:1-11
Jonah’s sense of grievance
[6] And the Lord God appointed a plan, and made it come up over Jonah, that it
might be a shade over his head, to save him from his discomfort. So Jonah was
exceedingly glad because of the plant. [7] But when dawn came up the next day,
God appointed a worm which attacked the plant, so that it withered. [8] When
the sun rose, God appointed a sultry east wind, and the sun beat upon the head
of Jonah so that he was faint; and he asked that he might die, and said, “It is
better for me to die than to live.”
God corrects Jonah and justifies his taking pity on Nineveh
*********************************************************************************************
Commentary:
4:1-11. The Ninevites repent, and God refrains from pursuing his course of ac-
tion. The book could end here, if its message were simply that God’s salvation
extends to the Gentiles as well. However, the dialogue that now takes place be-
tween Jonah and the Lord gives an unexpected twist to the story and enriches it
from the doctrinal point of view: it shows the full extent of God’s mercy; it tells
us why some prophetical oracles did not come true, even though they were the
utterances of genuine prophets; and it explains, in a definitive way, the reasons
behind God’s actions.
As in the rest of the book, the message lies in the characters themselves, parti-
cularly Jonah. He preached in Nineveh, but all the indications are that he did not
expect to have any effect. Indeed, even though he has seen that God has deci-
ded to forgive Nineveh, deep down he may feel that that will not last: the Nine-
vites will go back to their old ways, or God has simply delayed punishing them.
So, he takes up a position outside the city “to see what would become of (it)”
(v. 5). At first sight, Jonah’s anger (vv. 1-4, 8-9) seems almost grotesque; but
there is justification for it. To distinguish true from false prophecy, Deuteronomy
gave the following criterion: “when a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord, if
the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word which the Lord has
not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously, you need not be afraid
of him” (Deut 18:22). Therefore, as Jonah sees things, the Lord’s decision to pu-
nish Nineveh and then his reversal of it amounted to saying that Jonah was not
a true prophet.
The question raised here is a complex one and it deserves more than a superfi-
cial reply; hence the text’s insistence on the mercy of the Lord. When Jonah
earlier fled from God, even though he knew him to be the Lord, who created the
sea and the dry land (cf. 1:9), he knew that clemency and compassion were
essential traits of the Lord (cf. Ex 34:6-7); and he knows the same now (v. 4),
but he is unwilling to experience it in real life. Therefore, God uses this “castor-
oil plant” to give him a lesson about his mercy a practical as well as a theore-
tical lesson. The plant is, in the first place, an additional proof of god’s mercy: it
makes Jonah comfortable and soothes his anger (v. 6). But then the episode of
the plant becomes a kind of parable. If Jonah pities the plant which relieved his
discomfort (v. 10), why should God not take pity on those Ninevites? One could
think (as Jonah did) that enough was enough: a show of penance cannot dis-
guise the fact that Nineveh has always been a wicked city (cf. 1:2). And it is at
this point that the Lord gives further justification for his desire to forgive. The fact
of the matter is that the Ninevites did evil because they knew no better (they did
not know their right hand from their left: cf. Eccles 10:2) and there are more than
120,000 of them (literally, twelve times ten thousand), that is, a symbolic num-
ber suggesting that the Ninevites are more like the chosen people than Jonah
might think.
In this connexion, apropos the number of Ninevites, St John Chrysostom com-
ments: “This great number is mentioned for a particular reason: every prayer,
when it is offered in the company of many voices, has enormous power” (”De
incomprehensible Dei natura”, 3).
*********************************************************************************************
Source: “The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries”. Biblical text from the
Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries by members of
the Faculty of Theology, University of Navarre, Spain.
Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland, and
by Scepter Publishers in the United States.
From: Luke 10:38-42
Martha and Mary Welcome Our Lord
*********************************************************************************************
Commentary:
38-42. Our Lord was heading for Jerusalem (Luke 9:51) and His journey took Him
through Bethany, the village where Lazarus, Martha and Mary lived — a family for
whom He had a special affection, as we see in other passages of the Gospel (cf.
John 11:1-14; 12:1-9).
St. Augustine comments on this scene as follows: “Martha, who was arranging
and preparing the Lord’s meal, was busy doing many things, whereas Mary pre-
ferred to find her meal in what the Lord was saying. In a way she deserted her
sister, who was very busy, and sat herself down at Jesus’ feet and just listened
to His words. She was faithfully obeying what the Psalm said: ‘Be still and know
that I am God’ (Psalm 46:10). Martha was getting annoyed, Mary was feasting;
the former coping with many things, the latter concentrating on one. Both occu-
pations were good” (”Sermon”, 103).
Martha has come to be, as it were, the symbol of the active life, and Mary that
of the contemplative life. However, for most Christians, called as they are to sanc-
tify themselves in the middle of the world, action and contemplation cannot be re-
garded as two opposite ways of practising the Christian faith: an active life forget-
ful of union with God is useless and barren; but an apparent life of prayer which
shows no concern for apostolate and the sanctification of ordinary things also
fails to please God. The key lies in being able to combine these two lives, with-
out either harming the other. Close union between action and contemplation can
be achieved in very different ways, depending on the specific vocation each per-
son is given by God.
Far from being an obstacle, work should be a means and an occasion for a
close relationship with our Lord, which is the most important thing in our life.
Following this teaching of the Lord, the ordinary Christian should strive to attain
an integrated life — an intense life of piety and external activity, orientated to-
wards God, practised out of love for Him and with an upright intention, which ex-
presses itself in apostolate, in everyday work, in doing the duties of one’s state
in life. “You must understand now more clearly that God is calling you to serve
Him in and from the ordinary, material and secular activities of human life. He
waits for us every day, in the laboratory, in the operating room, in the army bar-
racks, in the university chair, in the factory, in the workshop, in the fields, in the
home and in all the immense panorama of work. Understand this well: there is
something holy, something divine, hidden in the most ordinary situations, and it
is up to each of you to discover it [...]. There is no other way. Either we learn to
find our Lord in ordinary, everyday life, or else we shall never find Him. That is
why I can tell you that our age needs to give back to matter and to the most tri-
vial occurrences and situations their noble and original meaning. It needs to re-
store them to the service of the Kingdom of God, to spiritualize them, turning
them into a means and an occasion for a continuous meeting with Jesus Christ”
(St. J. Escriva,”Conversations”, 114).
*********************************************************************************************
Source: “The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries”. Biblical text from the
Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries by members of
the Faculty of Theology, University of Navarre, Spain.
Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland, and
by Scepter Publishers in the United States.