"Hey, do I look like a precious metrosexual to you???"
Posted on 08/18/2015 5:22:20 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
Pope’s a commie. Next question.
No.
First ever totally corrupt POS communist.
The Pope is politicised! That means he’s evil.
He’s a Marxist first, then pope then catholic.
No, oh hellno.
Google (hate that verb) "Petrus Romanus"
Did any other Catholic get a real sense of something is really wrong when the last Pope “quit”?
Yes, the gospels of Lenin.
“This is the guy Malachi Martin warned Art Bell about. For realsies, as our precious metrosexual snowflakes might put it.
Google (hate that verb) “Petrus Romanus”
Correct.
This Pope and Obama are anti-Christ enablers.
He is an anti-Pope. Someone more knowledgable than me in the Word can probably give more details.
Expect him to back a one-world chruch that denies Christ’s status as the Son of God and even denies the existence of the God of Abraham, Jacob, and Israel. The tone will be “diversity of belief,” but the reality will be denial of Christianity.
Let those who have eyes see and those who have ears hear. /not MY words...
/a Catholic until this anti-Pope — sigh
Yup. A BIG one...
So I guess the pope really isn’t catholic after all...
Is the Pope Catholic? Who would have thought we would be asking this question.
Ironically, practically every priest and bishop in the world considers this "higher criticism" as Catholic dogma, since an "errant" bible is considered confirmation of the need for an authentic oral interpretive tradition (and for sitting religious authorities). In other words, it's considered an answer to Protestant sola scriptura.
I spent six years in the Catholic Church, and practically ever mainstream Catholic publication (OSV, Catholic Digest, Liguorian, US Catholic--you name it)contained an article attacking Biblical inerrency or "literal interpretation" as utterly alien to two millennia of tradition and as a recent Protestant creation to replace said tradition and authorities. Eventually the cognitive dissonance of belonging to such an organization got to me.
The "conservative" Catholic apologeticists in the orbit of OSV were particularly nasty. Then there's the fact that every current official Catholic bible (except for reprints of stuff from a century or more ago) contain higher critical commentary which denies that any of the events did or even could have happened. And these are officially approved by the bishops as "free of doctrinal error!"
The Catholic Church is reaping what it has sown.
Yes.
John Paul the II was kissing Korans and denying the Catholic religion in a multitude of ways. There is nothing new under the sun.
Bergoglio: material or formal.
True that.
He also ignored groups of catholics that came to address the ongoing sexual abuse by gay priests. JP2 did nada.
"Hey, do I look like a precious metrosexual to you???"
*throws a taco*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.