Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Leaning Right

According to the historian Paul Kennedy, Tsar Nicholas II was a Potemkin village in person. But it is still shameful that he was not allowed to leave Russia after his abdication. Even the Kaiser was allowed to live out his life in exile.


4 posted on 05/05/2015 6:38:16 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus; C19fan
His wife was an anti-social, neurotic who relied heavily on the fraudulent starets Rasputin. I do think that if not for her influence Nicholas II would have been more sociable, handled things better, but also less likely to make choices that he couldn't foresee the consequences of. As a ruler, his isolation was fatal to his reign.
6 posted on 05/05/2015 6:47:21 AM PDT by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus

Difference between what happened in Germany vs what happened in Russia. In Russia the Communist took over. In Germany, the navy mutinied, the infrastructure collapsed, but, the core of civilization remained.

That, and the Russian tradition of killing off Tzars that were unpopular, that’s the reason.


10 posted on 05/05/2015 9:27:20 AM PDT by Conan the Librarian (The Best in Life is to crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and the Dewey Decimal System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson