Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sorry to Disappoint the Social-Justice Warriors, but the Faithful Won’t Yield on Religious Liberty
National Review ^ | 4-1-15 | David French

Posted on 04/01/2015 10:20:11 PM PDT by ReformationFan

The conventional wisdom is that moral opposition to same-sex marriage will eventually evaporate — that even orthodox religious communities will learn to accommodate new cultural realities, and those few who don’t will ultimately be irrelevant, living on the margins of society. Evangelical churches will cave. The Catholic Church will cave. Jews will cave. In just a few, short years the Christian churches in America will look back at opposition to same-sex marriage with the same kind of shame that Southern Baptists view their segregationist past. That conventional wisdom is garbage. It’s based largely on a bigoted, ignorant view of the Christian faith, and it ignores recent history. The Left has drunk its own Kool-Aid for so long that it actually believes its rhetoric about church history and teachings.

We’ve been through this before. When Roe was decided, the major American Protestant denominations were in a transition process, with the mainline moving steadily out of orthodox Christianity. Their ultimate embrace of abortion wasn’t part of a considered, scriptural decision-making process but rather a product of spiritualized surrender to elite, progressive culture. The PCUSA, UCC, Episcopal Church, and others steadily liberalized — bending to the prevailing intellectual winds. For a time even the Southern Baptist Convention capitulated. Here’s Al Mohler: Two years before Roe, the Southern Baptist Convention passed a resolution calling for “legislation that will allow the possibility of abortion under such circumstances as rape, incest, clear evidence of fetal abnormality, and carefully ascertained evidence of the likelihood of damage to the emotional, mental, and physical health of the mother.” But while the mainline tacked left and kept tacking left, the SBC moved right, and decisively so. It’s now firmly and unequivocally pro-life.This move was part of a broader desire to follow scripture, as the SBC embraced the Bible, doubled down on orthodox Christianity, and defied the sexual revolution. What happened? Did the SBC whither away — becoming a church full of blue-haired holdouts, clinging to their guns and old-time religion as the mainline galloped away with the hearts and minds of the next generation? Hardly. It turns out that Christians generally want to be Christian, not spiritualized political liberals, so the mainline continued its slow-motion collapse while the SBC became bigger than all the major mainline churches combined. The churches that maintained orthodoxy did more than just survive, they thrived — and as one consequence, the pro-life movement has only gained political and cultural strength.

Given that same-sex marriage has the same level of scriptural support as abortion (none), we’ll see the same phenomenon at work in the contemporary churches. Christians who are already on their way out of orthodoxy will embrace same-sex marriage largely to the same extent that they’ve already embraced porn, abortion, and sex outside of marriage. In fact, churchgoing Christians who support same-sex marriage are eight times more likely than churchgoing Christians who oppose same-sex marriage to think viewing porn is acceptable, almost four times more likely to believe cohabitation is acceptable, almost six times more likely to think adultery is ok, and almost six times more likely to support abortion rights. The churchgoing supporter of same-sex marriage is much more like the average American than the average churchgoing American.

The cultural and legal forces demanding acceptance of same-sex marriage are every bit as strong as those demanding acceptance of abortion, yet orthodox churches have held firm. In fact, the legal forces supporting abortion have in some ways been much stronger than those demanding acceptance of same-sex marriage. For years, pro-life lawyers have known of the “abortion distortion” in constitutional law, where expressive activity that would be perfectly legal in virtually every other context can be criminally punished when turned against abortion (see, for example Hill v. Colorado). The Left is transparently trying to create the same kinds of legal double standards for same-sex marriage. And while they may temporarily change the law, they won’t change the culture of the church.

Earlier this year, Time carried a story about a Nashville Evangelical “megachurch” that announced its support for same-sex marriage. I’m quite familiar with that church. It’s down the street from my office, and one of my closest friends attended for years. It’s by no measure a “megachurch.” A few hundred people attend, making it tiny by the standards of the enormous churches that sprawl all over the greater Nashville area. And while it’s newsworthy that this church “came out,” Time buried the lede. Here’s what happened next: GracePointe’s move is not without concrete consequences. January giving usually is about $100,000–so far this month the church has brought in an estimated $52,000. When GracePointe began the listening process in 2012, Sunday attendance averaged 800-1000. The Sunday he preached the inclusion sermon, attendance was 673, and two weeks later, it was down to 482. “It’s a gut punch,” Mitchell says. “I know a year from now, I’m going to feel a whole lot better, but right now it is just hard.”

Yes, it is “hard” to abandon orthodox Christianity while still trying to draw orthodox Christians. And I have little doubt that Evangelical churches that try to go the way of the mainline will largely suffer the same fate. With isolated exceptions (for example, Barack Obama’s church in Chicago), they’ll whither away — losing members, buildings, and property but gaining the love and respect of MSNBC, the New York Times, and the Huffington Post. So, no. This fight is not ending anytime soon, and if the Left tries to snatch liberty from tens of millions of Americans, it can expect prolonged and vigorous resistance. In short, the Left has a choice: Respect liberty or fight forever. I suspect they’ll choose the fight.


TOPICS: Current Events; Evangelical Christian; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: davidfrench; faithful; homosexualagenda; religiousliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Good article.
1 posted on 04/01/2015 10:20:11 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

I agree. The compromisers are writing their own obituary. Those that persevere will grow even stronger.


2 posted on 04/01/2015 10:26:27 PM PDT by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

A basic problem for the homosexual salient - and for those who are making use of them - is that they are governed by their most extreme quintile. There is nothing to keep them in check. As we have seen in the current manufactured crisis, they will be pushed way too far. In this information age, with cameras everywhere and saturation media delivered through countless bandwidth spigots, the truth can get its boots on a lot faster than it used to.


3 posted on 04/01/2015 10:30:20 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Sorry to Disappoint the Social-Justice Warriors, but the Faithful Won’t Yield on Religious Liberty

I have to disagree. We are told this was to happen and it is. We are told it will get much worse and I truly believe it will.


4 posted on 04/01/2015 10:32:56 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (I am an American Not a Republican or a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Agreed


5 posted on 04/01/2015 10:46:04 PM PDT by Richard from IL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA
Greenfield makes much the same case in his blog posted here today: Greenfield: This Culture War We're In
6 posted on 04/01/2015 10:51:21 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA; ReformationFan
Rom 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

Rom 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

Rom 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Rom 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in [their] knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

Rom 1:29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

Rom 1:30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

Rom 1:31 Without understanding, covenant breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

Rom 1:32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

7 posted on 04/01/2015 11:07:39 PM PDT by itsahoot (55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. RIH-GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

The culture wars will be adjudicated in the courts. The politically incorrect will lose their cases in increasing numbers in front of agenda-driven judges. The price will be high, resulting in prison and even blood. See Russia 1935.

This will not mean the end of faithful churches or faithful followers of Christ. They just won’t look like they do today. And the evil is just a passing storm.


8 posted on 04/01/2015 11:11:41 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

9 posted on 04/01/2015 11:17:43 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://www.tedcruz.org/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

*


10 posted on 04/02/2015 12:47:03 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass ("Any girl can be glamorous. All you have to do is stand still and look stupid." Hedy Lamarr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Agree! This should also thin the Republican posers trying for the Presidency. Their actions and statements will be informative.


11 posted on 04/02/2015 12:50:28 AM PDT by Deagle (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

I am not a religious person, but the teachings of my upbringing were that “marriage” was a sacrament in the church. The Bill of Rights specifically prohibits Congressional establishment of religion. To define what is a sacrament in the church is to establish religion. Congress only has the power to declare a civil union.

It is up to the churches, synagogues, etc to define marriage in religious terms. There is one, a Presbyterian denomination, that includes gay unions in marriage.


12 posted on 04/02/2015 1:09:18 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
I don't know about you, but I can see that the Regime is already availing itself of every possible avenue of power in forcing its will on American citizens. It abuses the law and the legal system, dictates the mass media, and is quite effective at bullying in the marketplace.

The only thing it hasn't done is pointed guns in our faces, but we all know it is well equipped to do that have seen precedence of it.

13 posted on 04/02/2015 2:04:19 AM PDT by 9thLife ("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh2

You make a good point. In fact civil law has always been an application — necessarily secularized — of religious teachings. That IS the nature of the battle we’re in which nobody really wants to name. That IS the reason that to hate Christianity is to hate America as it was founded.


14 posted on 04/02/2015 2:06:28 AM PDT by 9thLife ("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Because too many government officials are now hostile to how God defines marriage, government is being used to force me to recognize and even enable “marriage” that God tells me is morally repulsive. Just as we have a separation of church and state, we must now have a separation of marriage and state. When marriage is a private matter, then anyone can enter into any manner of relationship they please, but they cannot use government to impose their definition on others.


15 posted on 04/02/2015 2:51:42 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

yes.


16 posted on 04/02/2015 3:08:52 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Very well said.....and true!

PCA Presbyterian broke away from the ever increasing liberal USA Presbyterian (mainline) almost 40 years ago .

PCA ( Presbyterian Church in America) is thriving!
We are prolife, pro family, scripture honoring, and involved.

USA Presbyterian has become an abomination and apostate!


17 posted on 04/02/2015 3:28:39 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
"I expect to die in bed, my successor will die in prison and his successor will die a martyr in the public square."

Francis Cardinal George, retired Archbishop of Chicago

18 posted on 04/02/2015 3:35:46 AM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
In this information age, with cameras everywhere and saturation media delivered through countless bandwidth spigots, the truth can get its boots on a lot faster than it used to.

They will have to do something about that.

Cordially,

19 posted on 04/02/2015 3:41:39 AM PDT by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

The homo nazis and their enablers in government and big industry are pushing hard. These groups attack economically by withholding dollars. While their team won’t ever be able to sustain Walmart, our team won’t push back against the likes of Walmart by depriving them of our dollars. As long as our team won’t gut-punch back with as much force as we receive, the advancing forces of the homo nazis will be unrelentingly successful.


20 posted on 04/02/2015 3:51:35 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson