Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Calvin could, of course, have made further appeal to Jerome's own opinion. Jerome, after all, cited "the common opinion of earlier times" in defense of his own very clear denial of canonical status to the Apocryphal books (as seen, for instance, in the prefaces he drafted for his Latin translation of the Bible). Jerome did, however, include -- with a clear disclaimer regarding their non-canonical status -- the Apocryphal books in his Vulgate, presumably in deference both to the merits of said books as ancient and useful (albeit uninspired) writings and to the opinion of those who disagreed with him about the canonicity of the books in question.

3 posted on 03/18/2015 5:10:45 AM PDT by Gamecock (Joel Osteen is a minister of the Gospel like Colonel Sanders is an Infantry officer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gamecock
Neither "Jerome's opinion" nor "Calvin's polemic" have any weight or authority in the matter, since, according to your own theology, only the Bible is finally authoritative.
4 posted on 03/18/2015 5:22:36 AM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Gamecock

Jerome of course did not substitute his opinion for the decision of the Holy Spirit speaking thru the Church.

unlike Calvin, Jerome kept the peace of the Church and obeyed John 17 and 1 Corinthians 1.


10 posted on 03/18/2015 5:52:10 AM PDT by one Lord one faith one baptism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson