Seems like the guy who runs the Paelojudaica blog has plenty of criticism of this guy’s conclusions, and relevant commentary from some of the people cited by the author:
http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/2006_06_04_archive.html#114985086427119562
http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/2004_06_13_paleojudaica_archive.html#108720376298688206
http://paleojudaica.blogspot.com/2004_06_13_paleojudaica_archive.html#108722885103448785
yes. thanks.
Jim Davila is a world-wide respected scholar ...(St. Andrews University, Scotland, with many years’ study in ancient Judean/Jewish/Christian writings....
Not that experts can’t make mistakes, they can....but I’d sure go with anything Davila said about ancient Judean manuscripts (his field of expertise) before I ran off to some unknown guy in Taiwan (who has apparently never published anything in any scholarly journals, at least none that I can find...?)