Posted on 01/26/2015 6:13:26 PM PST by ebb tide
“It” was never a man. “It” was born a female.
Nothing but crickets, huh?
Whoops. Wrong FourtySeven.
It looks like I may have posted to the wrong FortySeven too.
I was wondering if someone would ask that question.
The paper in question (Hoy) says he said that (or something similar). More precisely the paper implies he said that.
It’s not a quote.
There are certainly leftists everywhere in every paper on the planet. Some even more extreme than ours believe it or not.
And so what if he never used the term “gay marriage”. It’s clear that’s what he was refrencing when he was taking about this “new colonization” that is like the “Hitler Youth movement”.
Every little leftist heart in the world sunk the day he said those words and others in talking about the sanctity of marriage. They all knew he was taking about gay marriage. Everyone. Everyone knows it except apparently you.
Tell me, if not speaking against the homosexual assault on traditional marriage what do YOU think he was talking about?
A resurgence of Naziism?
The threat of a resurgence of imperialism, like every major country in the world is going to go out and start siezing poorer countries and making them colonies again? Like in the 19th century?
What? What was he talking about then that everyone else in the WORLD took him to be talking about gay “marriage”?
I’m not some Francis groupie, he’s not been a great Pope so far but put down the bais against him for a SECOND, if you can, and think RATIONALLY!
Yes, Francis was “clear”. Are you kidding me? Looks to me that you are the one who is biased.
It was a marvelous, intimate and unique experience. What happened in that meeting, what was said, is something that will remain between us, the ones that participated, since this is something I want to live with the utmost intimacy."
And I doubt it was a sacramental confession because "it" was "it"'s fiance at the time.
As I said in another thread (I think it was the “Pope Trannie” thread), then WHY was this made public?
The woman sounded like her mother and her might have been a little bit too enmeshed. There’s no mention of a father. Why this would result in a female wanting it become a male, I don’t know. But gender confusion largely has its genesis in poor bonding with a parent or sexual abuse.
So he is a lesbian?
A mentally ill man who mutilated his body but is still attracted to women
To quote Francis, “who are we to judge?”
It’s the new Catholic Church! (urp...)
Ed
No. She was a woman from day one. She’s now a lesbian who mutilated herself.
So is Francis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.