To: Gamecock; metmom; daniel1212; BlueDragon; Mark17
In his trip to the Philippines, Pope Francis once again defended marriage, and he again edged closer to a firm, unequivocal papal statement against same-sex “marriage.” How do we know he's not being mistranslated?
10 posted on
01/23/2015 3:07:48 PM PST by
Alex Murphy
("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
To: Alex Murphy
If you read the CNA link within the OP, he never comes out (heh, no pun intended) and says “gay marriage”. It is the Vatican spokesperson that says Francis is referring to “gay marriage” in part when he says “new ideological colonization”.
11 posted on
01/23/2015 3:11:40 PM PST by
piusv
To: Alex Murphy
How do we know he's not being mistranslated? It's kinda funny.
After every boneheaded statement he makes, the folks rush out to say that we just don't the context, and, when that doesn't work, tell us that somebody mistranslated.
In the latest episode, nobody is claiming a mistranslation or missed context, but they are adding words -- "gay marriage" that aren't there. Was the pope talking about gay "marriage?" According to his [usual] [mis]translators, yes.
OK. This time they translated properly. Who am I to judge?
13 posted on
01/23/2015 3:29:25 PM PST by
FredZarguna
(O, Reason not the need.)
To: Alex Murphy
*he again edged closer to a firm, unequivocal papal statement against same-sex “marriage.”**
Why edge? Shouldn’t this be an easy one?
15 posted on
01/23/2015 3:29:54 PM PST by
Gamecock
(Joel Osteen is a preacher of the Gospel like Colonel Sanders is an Army officer.)
To: Alex Murphy
How do we know he's not being mistranslated? The Semi-Official Catholic Internet Magisterium (SOCIM) will tell you.
29 posted on
01/24/2015 4:13:09 AM PST by
daniel1212
(Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson