Just what is your issue?
This is the second thread you’ve done this on.
You never answered it when I asked on the other thread and yet you’ve just done it again.
Can you have the integrity to answer?
I don’t understand what that has to do with my post to metmom.
Help?
Took me a few minutes, but after going to your link above I see you are referring to the site in which this sermon was obtained for posting/linking. However, Tozer in no way was 'liking the modern world.' If you see that in his sermon above or the other one posted, then please show us.
However, you did point out that anyone can and will post or link works of others available by distribution rights or lack thereof on the internet. For example, if Joel Osteen posted a sermon from Pope Francis I on his website, the discerning eye would note that in no way was the Vatican endorsing Joel Osteen. For example, perhaps a devout Roman Catholic conducts a basic Google search for "Pope Francis on Climate Change" and the first hit is Joel Osteen's website. Then they post it here linking the Osteen site. On further review maybe they should have gone to the Vatican site instead or here on FR.
So, IMO, your point on the web source of the article is valid but does not represent the views of the deceased author. One only needs to read the sermon to figure that one out. When the midnight Mass from St. Peter's in the Vatican is televised each year, do people really think the Pope endorses the programming before and after the televised Mass? Of course not, what does the Vatican have to do with "The Family Guy" or "David Letterman?"
Well at least we can see you have nothing that you disagree with the article about. I would be interested in your explanation as to how the hosting site of the article is of relevance. Surely you think it has relevance right?