Given that Our Lord said that divorce and remarriage was adultery, and that St. Paul says that he who partakes of the Eucharist unworthily does so to his condemnation, I simply don’t understand how it is possible logically to say that communion for divorced and remarried is solely disciplinary. It seems rather obvious to me that it is mixed disciplinary and doctrinal issue. Am I just being obtuse, or are the Kasperites simply playing Marxist/Alinskyite word games to confuse the faithful?
Why do you blame it all on Kasper?
It’s Francis who keeps bringing the subject back up for more “votes”.