Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catalog of Sin – All Items are in Stock, Free Shipping and Handling from the Supplier
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 11-17-14 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 11/18/2014 7:50:17 AM PST by Salvation

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: NorthMountain

The instance of thinking unjustly of another.


81 posted on 11/19/2014 8:50:04 AM PST by southernmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: southernmann

You’re going to have to put some of your own thoughts into this conversation, ELIZA. Otherwise, it’s not a conversation.

So, ELIZA, what do YOU think the relationship between “the objective truth” and “thinking justly or unjustly of another” might be?


82 posted on 11/19/2014 9:01:51 AM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

I don’t, because I do not know what “the objective truth” is...that’s why I asked.


83 posted on 11/19/2014 9:08:34 AM PST by southernmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: southernmann

Which part don’t you understand? “Objective” or “Truth”?


84 posted on 11/19/2014 9:12:17 AM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

the term...’objective truth’...as you are using it


85 posted on 11/19/2014 9:22:20 AM PST by southernmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: southernmann
"That which is" as opposed to "That which is not"

Do you understand that "A" and "Not-A" cannot both be true? Do you even understand what that question means?

BTW, if you wish for this conversation to continue, you need to convince me ... quickly ... that you're discussing matters in good faith. As opposed to arguing for the sake of being argumentative, or trying to play "gotcha" games. I have no patience for either.

86 posted on 11/19/2014 9:27:17 AM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

I have no idea what you are talking about.

Can’t you just go back to #48 and answer the simple question? It’s on the last line I believe.

I’m beginning to think that you don’t really know what you mean by the use of your term...’objective truth’

Do you even remember what sin we’re talking about?

What do you mean by ‘discussing matters in good faith’...please be detailed?


87 posted on 11/19/2014 9:33:05 AM PST by southernmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: southernmann
How about we instead go back to Number 44, in which I quoted this, from another of the OP author's works:

Pride - The sinful drive that distorts proper self love so that we esteem ourself more than is proper and at the same time denigrate the goodness of others. There is such a thing as well ordered self love and self esteem but Pride is love of self which is perverted causes us unjustly to think of others as beneath us or less worthy. Pride also stirs us to reject lawful authority of others over us including God and refuses appropriate submission. Pride is at the root of every sin for through it we pridefully think we have a way better than what God has set forth or that we alone can be the judge of right and wrong. Adam and Eve wanted to “be like Gods” and wanted themselves to determine what was right and wrong. Hence they demanded to eat of the tree of the “Knowledge of good and evil.” This is Pride.

Do you have any comprehension of this paragraph? Does it spark any thoughts at all in your mind?

Some other questions for you:

1) Do you acknowledge the existence of any deity whatsoever, whether singular or one of many?

2) Do you acknowledge the existence of a singular deity that created all things which we perceive with our senses?

3) Do you acknowledge that you, yourself were created out of nothing by a singular deity, and held in existence by said deity?

4) Do you acknowledge that a singular deity caused its messages to humans to be recorded in writing? That said writings are found in what is commonly known as "The Bible"?

5) Do you acknowledge that a singular deity took on human flesh, lived and died as a human, and rose from the dead?

88 posted on 11/19/2014 9:43:53 AM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Yes, which led to my response already...in #48 last line

I am an agnostic that believes there probably is a deity, but have no way of, or desire to, prove it. I don’t know if there is only one, probably is.


89 posted on 11/19/2014 9:56:32 AM PST by southernmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: southernmann
I am an agnostic etc.

OK. Thank you.

Now:

Do you understand that "A" and "Not-A" cannot both be true? Do you even understand what that question means?

90 posted on 11/19/2014 10:00:15 AM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Is God both the alpha and the omega?


91 posted on 11/19/2014 10:01:02 AM PST by southernmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: southernmann

How about we address non-contradiction, first.


92 posted on 11/19/2014 10:04:24 AM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Is that statement not a contradiction?

For men, A cannot be not A...for God, I don’t know.

Does that also mean the beginning cannot be the end?


93 posted on 11/19/2014 10:09:30 AM PST by southernmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: southernmann
Is southernmann both older and newer?
And what was his handle before?

94 posted on 11/19/2014 10:11:11 AM PST by Darksheare (People who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: southernmann
A beginning and an end are different aspects of a thing. You have a beginning and an end; same as the rest of us humans.

Now ... since you acknowledge non-contradiction, you must also acknowledge the singularity of truth. With the singularity of truth in mind, let's revisit that paragraph about sinful pride:

Pride - The sinful drive that distorts proper self love so that we esteem ourself more than is proper and at the same time denigrate the goodness of others. There is such a thing as well ordered self love and self esteem but Pride is love of self which is perverted causes us unjustly to think of others as beneath us or less worthy. Pride also stirs us to reject lawful authority of others over us including God and refuses appropriate submission. Pride is at the root of every sin for through it we pridefully think we have a way better than what God has set forth or that we alone can be the judge of right and wrong. Adam and Eve wanted to “be like Gods” and wanted themselves to determine what was right and wrong. Hence they demanded to eat of the tree of the “Knowledge of good and evil.” This is Pride.

we esteem ourself more than is proper ... Do you see any correlation between the singular truth about oneself, and the degree to which one esteems oneself?

at the same time denigrate the goodness of others Do you see any correlation between the singular truth about another, and the degree to which one passes judgment on that other's goodness?

Do you understand that actually knowing the entire truth about oneself, or about others, borders on impossible? Do you think, perhaps, that judgments passed on oneself or others, based on an incomplete knowledge of the truth might perhaps best be tempered in accordance with that lack of knowledge?

95 posted on 11/19/2014 10:21:47 AM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Looks like he got nuked.

Right in front of my face!


96 posted on 11/19/2014 10:27:35 AM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Seems that he was known.


97 posted on 11/19/2014 10:29:49 AM PST by Darksheare (People who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

For a while, I was starting to be convinced that it was an ELIZA program ...


98 posted on 11/19/2014 10:33:46 AM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Yeah, those have gotten more sophisticated lately.
There is even one for cellphone text spamming.


99 posted on 11/19/2014 10:43:41 AM PST by Darksheare (People who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
I go on Tuesdays. It’s only $14 a week (if I’m not at goal), much cheaper than a therapist.

You betcha.

100 posted on 11/20/2014 7:05:35 AM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson