Posted on 11/10/2014 5:35:07 PM PST by ebb tide
Shahzad Masih was 28 years old and his wife, Shama, 25, two young Catholics with four children. She was pregnant with the fifth. She was working in a job in a brick making factory known for exploiting its workers, whose owner, a Muslim, had already brutally beat her. She worked in Kasur, near Lahore, in that Pakistan where Christians are considered as trash. Last November 4th the two young people were falsely accused of having profaned pages of the Koran. They were tortured for two days, lynched by a furious mob and at the end thrown into an oven and burned. These slaughters are not rare. It is a continual horror that Christians undergo at the hands of a people and a State that daily humiliates them and threatens them with death by means of the notorious blasphemy laws. Pakistan is not a small country. It has the atomic bomb and has 180 million inhabitants, making it the sixth most populous nation in the world and the second most populous among Muslim nations after Indonesia. The fiery ordeal underwent by these two Christians in such a savage way was reported even in our own newspapers. But there was no action taken, neither by individuals, nor associations, nor institutions.
Someone made the accusation that public opinion was more scandalized by the investigation on the TV show, “Report”, on the source of the goose down used in making expensive ski jackets, namely, that the feathers were plucked from geese four times a year, causing the geese a great deal of pain—than by the fate of these Christians. In the same way people were scandalized by the involuntary killing of a bear in Trentino, while the killing of three Italian Sisters in an African country went unnoticed. There are those who have reported that Pope Bergoglio himself, even though speaking out on all sorts of things every day and more as well, has maintained silence concerning this tragedy. If he is the primary one to not speak about these horrors (he prefers to pontificate on gossip that goes on in parishes, a topic of tens of his homilies), then we cannot accuse the world of insensitivity. In effect Bergoglio never had the will to say one word, not even in defense of poor Asia Bibi, a mother living in poverty with four children who has been locked up for five years in a filthy prison where she has been tortured in unspeakable ways and who has been condemned to death by hanging only because she is a Christian. The poor woman wrote to the Pope, but in vain. Not even the confirmation of her condemnation to death in the court of appeal has moved Bergoglio, who is always very timid and reticent in dealing with Muslims.
It was Kyril, the Patriarch of Moscow and all Russia, who felt obligated to intervene in formally asking the President of Pakistan, in the name of the Orthodox Church, for mercy in behalf of the Catholic Asia Bibi. But Papa Bergoglio did no such thing. Moreover he was silent in an obvious way also in the case of Meriam in Sudan, when so many Christians who live in Pakistan are living through the same tragedy that Asia Bibi is. And nothing is said about the violence and abuses suffered above all by young Christian women. In his daily homilies given at the chapel at Santa Marta he instead devotes himself to hitting on the head those whom he considers as “conservatives”, who are in fact in the majority, as was seen at the Synod. And he places severe and continual blame on Christians in general, whom he depicts as full of defects. But there are those very Christians whom he, as a pastor, should defend and comfort: those same Christians who in so many places in the world are undergoing persecution, martyrdom and hatred under every power and ideology.
Eighty percent of victims of religious discrimination in the world are Christians. This is confirmed in this very week by two important statements: in the “Black Book of the Situation of Christians in the Word” (published by Mondadori), and the annual report of “Aid to the Church in Need”. It is a tragedy that has been ongoing for years. I published what has been going on twelve years ago as “the newly persecuted” and the scene was identical. The same for numbers: one hundred thousand Christians have been killed every year because of their faith. This means five victims a minute. The total of persecuted Christians is around 200 million, and the news of atrocities and massacres—if one has the will to pay attention to them—comes out daily. It is enough to read the reports of the representative of the press who have gone to Erbil to speak with the thirty thousand Christians who are in flight, who still are exposed to rain, to hunger and cold, because they have been driven from their homes by the terrorists of ISIS. Every family grieves over their own tragic circumstances: daughters seized and sold like slaves in the market in Mosul, husbands and sons killed and then crucified, buried alive, their throats cut, women raped. Recently a video was circulated by the militant Islamists that showed them haggling over the price of a slave. Sometimes they show young girls being sold for a cheap price. And in Africa we see the same tragedy enfolding. Just recently we heard of the fate of the 200 young women students seized in Nigeria by Boko Haram, raped and forced to convert to Islam and forced to marry Islamic men. And then there is Syria and the other Islamic countries. Then there are the Communist countries like China and its immense Gulag that has swallowed up heroic Catholic bishops. Then there is that inhuman concentration camp that is North Korea where thousands and thousands of Christians have simply disappeared in the jaws of the monster.
After the horror of the Christians burned in Pakistan the President of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, himself horrified, said on Vatican Radio: “Can one remain passive when confronted with crimes declared to be legitimate by religion?” No. One cannot. But Pope Bergoglio must be made to know this as well. The Cardinal asked in a deeply moving way: “Should not the international community make an intervention?” Of course. But the Pope? It is the same story as last summer, with respect to the massacre perpetrated by ISIS. The Pope was not only reticent, but when he was approached directly about this on the flight returning from Korea he wanted to emphasize that force and bombings should not be used to defend those defenseless people who were threatened by massacre at the hand of criminals. A commentator even from the Left like Andriano Sofri tried to make him see that this “would leave women, children, and the old at the mercy of these men”. Certainly Francis has spoken about persecution at various times. It is true. But he has done so always in a generic way, repeating the same sentence: “There are more martyrs today than in the first centuries”. But he has never intervened in specific cases or to stop the massacres. He has never condemned the slaughters by calling them by their proper name. He has never activated channels of intervention. He has never named Islam or Communism. He has never involved the Church. It seems that he does not wish to tread on the persecutors’ toes. He always speaks of Muslims as dialogue partners to whom he sends his best wishes for Ramadan. Even with respect to Communism, the most bloodthirsty anti-Christian experiment in history, he avoids the subject by saying that he has known militant Communists in Argentina who were fine persons. “Who am I to judge”? He shows his heated and judgmental tone only when he attacks free-market policies.
On October 28 he hosted in the Vatican various movements against globalization, including the leftist Leoncavallo group from Milan, and he hurled thunderbolts in such a way that Fausto Bertinotti on the [Italian public network] TV news show “Tg3” said that Bergoglio was the “revolutionary” of the moment. Bertinotti emphasized that Bergoglio in that meeting—in which he never referred to the proclamation of salvation of Jesus Christ—said a word that no Pope had ever pronounced: struggle [lotta].” In effect, Sandro Magister noted: “What strikes one about this discourse is the amazing similarity with the theories held by the philosopher Toni Negri and his disciple Michael Hardt in a book published in 2002 that made a big splash, called Empire."
The no-global* drift together with the disastrous attempt at the Synod to change Church praxis and, in effect, Church doctrine (which will be completed at the next Synod), and with a governance of the Church consisting of defenestrations and “purges” of those who are faithful to Catholic Tradition, place the Church today in a tragic situation. It is not only about persecutions. There is darkness in Rome.
He’s not satan, but according to Fr. Gabriele Amorth, an Italian exorcist, there are satanic cult members in the Vatican.
According to him, “There are priests, monsignors, and even cardinals!”
Well that’s the signless event—that can happen at a moments notice (today or tomorrow). Doesn’t mean this false prophet can’t begin his father’s work before we’re outta here?
By personalizing Christ I meant, more of boxing Him in....I see what you’re saying now.
“The pope during WWII maintained a neutral stance.”
Not true. That was KGB propaganda to damage the credibility of the Catholic church.
Save
He’s a political lefty. He’s P.C. He is persecuting Catholics and elevating anti-Catholics. About once a week, he throws out some prolefeed for the “traditionalists” by talking about the devil or Mary.
Bookmarked.
“...is the Pope Catholic?”
Not sure anymore!
Obama and Pope Francis are the mirror opposite of Reagan and Pope Jean-Paul II. A great darkness is in this world.
Jorge Bergoglio does not deserve to be called Pope. How a group of supposedly sane Cardinals could have elected this hack left wing wind bag is beyond me. He portrays himself as being humble. Yet, he never shuts his mouth, and is always telling one group or another how they should live their lives, mostly in poverty. He tried to “fix” the synod he called but got caught because he was so inept and heavy handed it became obvious. As a Catholic, I anxiously await the arrival of his successor. In the meantime may our triune God protect us.
This pope sucks.
Perhaps, when the white smoke emerges from the chimney, Raymond Cardinal Burke will soon emerge onto the balcony as Pope Leo XIV and spend the very first week of his papacy accepting curial resignations. Perhaps Benedict XVI would consent to play a significant role and Leo XIV he will be surrounded by hundreds of Knights and Dames of Malta at his coronation.
Dare we hope that he have a serious discussion with Archbishop Blase Cupich of Chicago and Donald Cardinal Wuerl of DC and Walter Cardinal Kasper and Reinhard Cardinal Marx of Munich and Freising and others like them as to the joys of the quiet post-retirement life in a cloister sealed like a bank vault where each can engage in a life of prayer, penance and self-denial and offer them prepared resignation forms, accepted upon signature?
At one time I was very supportive of Pope Francis but when strange stuff started to come out from the recent marriage and family synod, I ended up dropping a tag line in reference to the Pope.
We can hope. Some time back I remember reading that Pope Francis said he could end up doing no more then another 2 or 3 years before stepping down.
What a BIG difference 25-30 years has made between St. John Paul II and Pope Francis!
Really, why then did the Vatican apologize?
http://tech.mit.edu/V118/N13/bvatican.13w.html
Face it, Catholicism is a facade. That’s why the catechism altered the second commandment. Shame on Catholics. DO NOT ADD TO OR TAKE FROM THE BIBLE!
What may I ask are you babbling about?
What may I ask are you babbling about?
Just a little ‘ole issue about not adding to or taking away from scripture (Rev. 22:19). Some Christian sects have no problem with ignoring the 2nd commandment...guess they know better than God.
Oh ye of little faith...God would never have allowed any manmade government to destroy Jews & Christians. Did Jesus tell the apostles to remain mum during times of persecution, or did he tell them to go out to faraway lands and preach? BTW, there are numerous historical documents and photographs documenting Catholic support of the Nazi party. Nevermind the truth, though.
http://emperors-clothes.com/vatican/cpix.htm
This does not negate the heroism of those who, like Pope Pius XII, were actively involved in assisting and rescuing the victims, and this not on an incidental basis, but on a grand scale.
Jewish Holocaust researcher Gary L, Krupp found evidence that Pius XII secretly moved Jews out of Europe. He conducted dozens of video interviews, among them a witness account of a priest who revealed a secret “underground railroad,” directly ordered by the Pope, sending more than 10,000 Jews to the U.S. via the Dominican Republic. Many countries would not accept “Jews,” so they were given false baptismal papers to travel as Catholics. Pius successfully stopped the deportation of tens of thousands of Hungarian Jews when he appealed to the Regent of Hungary. Similarly, he desperately tried to impact the deportation policies of many other countries to, in his words, “save this vibrant community.”
Rabbi David G. Dalin, Ph.D., a widely published scholar of American Judaism and author of the 2005 book The Myth of Hitler’s Pope, provides a trove of information about Pius’ efforts in his piece “A Righteous Gentile: Pope Pius XII and the Jews.” For instance:
"... In June 1942, Pius spoke out against the mass deportation of Jews from Nazi-occupied France, further instructing his Papal Nuncio in Paris to protest to Marshal Henri Petain, Vichy France’s Chief of State, against “the inhuman arrests and deportations of Jews from the French occupied zone to Silesia and parts of Russia.”
The London Times of October 1, 1942, explicitly praises him for his condemnation of Nazism and his public support for the Jewish victims of Nazi terror. “A study of the words which Pope Pius XII has addressed since his accession,” noted the Times, “leaves no room for doubt. He condemns the worship of force and its concrete manifestations in the suppression of national liberties and in the persecution of the Jewish race.”
Pius XII’s Christmas addresses of 1941 and 1942, broadcast over Vatican radio to millions throughout the world, also help to refute the fallacious claim that Pope Pius was “silent.” Indeed, as The New York Times described Pius’ 1941 Christmas address in its editorial the following day, it specifically applauded the Pope, as a “lonely” voice of public protest against Hitler.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.