> “This was the case with slavery. John C Calhoun said that the South not only needed a constitutional right to own slaves but to own them free of criticism.”
The above from your post #2.
You can resort to all the name calling and misguided derision you want. And you can change the subject at your whim.
My comments stand.
Calhoun's statement
The goal of the homosexual lobby.
But do you lack the brain power to see how these two concepts are the same?
And by the way, to any informed reader, your comments stand as clear evidence you don’t know what you’re talking about, apparently either in the substance of the article, or in the substance of what Calhoun said about slavery.