Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Varda

“He is our son” is absolutely not the justification for the scenario I painted. The justification, which is indeed a mandate is the Church’s teaching that the homosexual must be treated with dignity. If one movement was made betraying their sinful relationship, the family would have to ask them to leave. As long as there is a “don’t flaunt, don’t mention” rule which is obeyed, their presence alone could be acceptable. Tough situation.


38 posted on 10/06/2014 7:46:08 PM PDT by amihow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: amihow

If children weren’t involved I could go along with you. I would say that either man should be welcomed individually but not together as long as children are present.

Of course, people involved in destructive behavior should always be treated with dignity. This is a tough situation with some hard choices with serious pitfalls for the parents who face it.


45 posted on 10/06/2014 8:01:43 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson