To analyze the situation correctly, all you need to consider is the rotten fruits of Vatican II (which I won't elaborate on here: they are legion and indisputable) almost independent of what the documents actually say. There is no point in arguing about interpretation vs. intent: the rotten fruits are all the evidence you need. There is no question the devil has used Vatican II to his own diabolical ends. Without the Council, he could not have done that. Satan was the mastermind behind that great innovation. If its actual intent had been more clearly spelled out in the documents it would have never been adopted.
"In 1960 it will become clearer".
I agree with you that there have been “rotten fruits” in the years after Vatican II. But I don’t think it’s the Council itself, but those in the church who have done things in “the spirit of Vatican II”.