Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MDLION
It seems to me that SSPX are still in schism.

The Church is in schism from SSPX. SSPX stayed the same -- the Church changed "In 1960 it will become clear". Vatican II attempted to blur the difference between Catholics and protestants, between Mass and a service. Even the Muslims are now being welcomed into the grand vision of VII (but without converting). Leads me to wonder if SSPX represents the Real Church. I think it might, along with those earlier members a little weak of conviction who drifted back to Rome.

6 posted on 09/26/2014 5:11:38 PM PDT by steve86 ( Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: steve86

I hear about what “Vatican II” supposedly did but when I read the actual documents I find religious told to go back to their founders and put their habits back on. I find abortion called an “unspeakable crime”. I don’t find all the liberalism and heresy in the Vatican II documents I’m told are there. Yes, many in the church abused authority with a “spirit of Vatican II”, but when you ask them to quote from the specific documents, they can’t.


7 posted on 09/29/2014 1:12:42 PM PDT by MDLION ("Trust in the Lord with all your heart" -Proverbs 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson