Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: redleghunter

Thank you. Dispensationalists and amills argue as if they are the only two peas in the pod, after one side refutes the other side, they leave people with the conclusion that their view is the only alternative. Not so.

If you are interested, here’s a link with a great mass of evidence from the Fathers, theologians who wrote on prophetic themes in the years immediately following the 1st century early church, and before the councils. Evidence as to which is the historic view (the Fathers were obviously premills, hence “Historic” Premill).

http://answersinrevelation.org/Ecfs.html


17 posted on 08/18/2014 6:06:31 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: sasportas; redleghunter
...the 1st century early church, and before the councils. Evidence as to which is the historic view (the Fathers were obviously premills, hence “Historic” Premill).

You are right that prior to the emergence of the institutional church the dominant view was Premillennial. If you can find some articles that will compare and contrast pre-nicene Premillennialism with modern Premillennialism I would be very interested in reading them.

22 posted on 08/18/2014 8:42:51 PM PDT by wmfights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: sasportas

Thanks will read it. Was too busy with others dealing with that atheist yesterday:)


48 posted on 08/20/2014 10:45:23 PM PDT by redleghunter (But let your word 'yes be 'yes,' and your 'no be 'no.' Anything more than this is from the evil one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson