I support nuking Mecca outside the Haj season; a minimized loss of Muslim lives will probably increase mass abandonment of Islam by those who look & see that their religion was nothing but a huge lie.
The proof of G-d’s goodness is in the continued survival of the state of Israel; seven million thriving Jews versus more than three hundred million Muslims languishing in the Arab world alone must be due to more than just superior Israeli weaponry.
Pakistan nuking Delhi? That will pit 78 million Pakis against a billion enraged Hindus whose memory of the Mughal slaughters of their forebears remains strong to this day.
As for the Islamic conquest of Rome, won’t that bring in Italy’s NATO allies as well? As for the mighty Turkish navy, they can’t even scare the Jews in Israel. Turkey’s military had best stick to its role as guarantor of good government in Ankara.
Israel is a far more righteous target for the muzzies than Rome, and Israel is still there. Wonder just what gives the `sons of the Prophet’ reason to pause, anyway?
Do not want an increase in abandonment, want absolute and immediate abandonment.
Rome only needs to be destroyed for it to be counted as a conquest. Nuking will do nicely for them, and Iran has the solution, and it will encourage the Little Guy to climb out of the Well to begin the total extinction of the human race, aka bringing everyone to Paradise.
Its not the numbers of Paks who die as martyrs by enraged Hindus, its the mass of pagans dead that counts for the muslims.
Turkey is not an issue. The muslims already control it.
NATO is not an issue. In this scenario Mecca and Medina are already gone. NATO’s role, if any, is limited to helping the Italian survivors.
The article specifically states that after Jerusalem, Rome is next. NYC is and has been a target, albeit a modern one - although it could be looked on as the seat of the hated Jewish bankers. All these are righteous targets and, if the jihadis follow their usual pattern, all three will be hit simultaneously and NOTE: without warning. Therefore, hit them hard and brutally first, before they do it to us, which they will.
If the West actually wants to win the war, and not a battle or a skirmish here and there, it (we) must stop thinking like kindly Christians, and learn to think like the Islamic enemy; short of that is a further prescription for a continued war and eventual defeat.
And think about this: each world war has seen increased casualties, with WWII reaching hundreds of millions, counting all those killed by socialists before, during, and after WWII. The next war, if the West continues to not name the enemy and uses the kinder, gentler approach, will see deaths in the billions.
Shoebat is a Catholic moonbat.