Replies

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.

It ain't authoritative if it ain't in the King James version.

3 posted on 04/02/2014 8:32:45 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford; All

And most likely you would want that verse to be spoken in Pennsylvanian Dutch, too, right? I imagine that they would want this...

Elephant versus the gnat. Sigh. Which to strain and which to swallow?

5 posted on 04/02/2014 8:35:32 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

The Bible: Its Original Languages and English Translations
http://www.goarch.org/ourfaith/ourfaith7068

The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy
http://www.bible-researcher.com/chicago1.html

18 posted on 04/02/2014 8:52:47 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

the King James Version is full of errors. Any historian can tell you that. Just look at the preface to the “Revised King James” for my authority on that subject.

19 posted on 04/02/2014 9:01:33 AM PDT by Kansas58

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search

Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794