If there were another author as capable of mentioning let alone remarking so articulately on this debacle, without coarse language, I would post it instead.
(She did herself edit out one word ****.)
On another point: how else does the public become aware of the gravity and depravity of sodomy without a description. People today are so hung up on science and proof of arguments that to leave out the gory details of what sodomy is would be for people to be left in ignorance of the gravity of crime.
[ On another point: how else does the public become aware of the gravity and depravity of sodomy without a description. People today are so hung up on science and proof of arguments that to leave out the gory details of what sodomy is would be for people to be left in ignorance of the gravity of crime. ]
One can make a great argument against such acts of sodomy using science itself as most acts concerning it are very non-hygenic by their very nature.
The coarse language is unfortunate, but necessary.
I agree with you (and Ann, and the Duck Commander).