[fishtank]

Mark Hitchchock vs Hank Hannegraf - Debate - Date of the Book of Revelation (Pt 1 of 3) Pre-Trib.org

Hannegraf was way out of his league in this debate.

[sasportas]

Toward the end of the debate, HH must have realized he had lost the debate. About all he had left in his bag of tricks was to snarl at Mark Hitchcock for saying he was a Preterist.

Amazingly, he argues for Preterism throughout the debate then turns around and denies that is what he is; acting highly offended when he is asked “If you claim you are not a Preterist, what then are you?” His answer, “I’m an investigative eschatologist” is cowardly... and hilarious. Preterists, I’ve noticed, are like that, very shy about admitting that is what they are.

[dartuser]

Hannegraf was way out of his league in this debate.

I have never had the time to watch this debate yet. But I have read Hitchcock's PhD thesis in its entirety. It goes through Gentry's thesis in detail and, in my opinion, drives a final stake through the heart of preterism ... the Neronic date of Revelation.