Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick
Dear Tax-chick,

Yeah. I've read it through completely just once so far. I've read parts a couple of times. It IS heavy reading.

Some of what he's saying resonates very clearly, but some of it is a little murky to me, so far. It may be in part because I'm kind of behind the times. “Heterosexuality,” as a reified “sexual orientation” does bless or sanction, in my mind, various heterosexual sins. So, perhaps for that reason, I'm not so willing to overthrow “heteronormativity,” since, in my mind, that umbrella doesn't excuse sexual sins committed by folks who like folks of the opposite sex.


sitetest

7 posted on 03/03/2014 6:48:12 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest; Tax-chick
Dear Tax-chick,

Delay of game, 5 yard penalty.

“’Heterosexuality,’ as a reified ‘sexual orientation’ does bless or sanction, in my mind, various heterosexual sins.”

Should have been:

“’Heterosexuality,’ as a reified ‘sexual orientation’ does NOT bless or sanction, in my mind, various heterosexual sins.”

Yikes.

Sorry.


sitetest

44 posted on 03/03/2014 8:47:52 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson