You think casual readers will understand what you meant?
Just use the term homosexual. This is the proper term to describe them. When you play semantics, you're already accepting their premise.
Let me try this again. I will replace the slang word meaning something of poor quality (no, it wasn’t a curse word, and yes, it is used here frequently) with a milder, though less accurate word. As silly as it would be to remove the post for that commonly used word, I’m sure that must be why the moderator removed my post, because the alternative would be that the moderator disagreed with my opposition to the homosexual agenda. I can’t imagine a Free Republic moderator actually supporting the homosexual agenda, so it must have been my use of that unpleasant, though accurate word.
To: EEE
What? Try reading what I wrote, instead of making up [things] you wish I had said. You can call them “gay” all day long, but you can’t make it true. You can call their perversion “marriage,” but that doesn’t make it so. It isn’t a matter of semantics. Those words have actual meanings, whether you like it or not. Pretending homosexuals are happy and gay and married will never make it so. Why would you even want to pervert those words in the first place? They are homosexuals engaging in homosexual acts. I’m not going to lie about that by saying they are gay. I’m not going to cover for them by lying about what they are.