What you posted no doubt exists but it is not the dispensationalism of Ryrie, Walvoord and the likes of Dallas theological seminary. I would not know what seminary or university such hyper dispensationalism comes from. But it would no doubt go hand in hand with the mid or end of Acts church vs Pentecost church. As I have pointed out in other threads is error given there is only ONE Gospel as given by Jesus Christ in Luke 24 and confirmed by Paul in 1 Corinthians 15.
“Traditional” dispensationalism has one church age not two or three as I remember it. Most believe the church age ends with the rapture (and there are varying views of timing pre, mid etc) in which time Israel becomes the focus of redemption through the shed Blood of Christ. Yes I’ve seen some of the other views here on FR of tribulation Hebrews instituting the Mosaic sacrifice system etc. but never came across that in the traditional dispensational writings. I have seen criticisms against the 1,000 year reign and Ezekiel temple institutions by some saying ‘that’ suggests dispies are promoting two paths to salvation. However I think you would probably disagree with such criticisms.
So honestly I don’t know where some of these views of separate bodies and gospels are coming from. I know of no seminaries promoting such which leads me to believe they are internet machinations.
I will point out that comparing a traditional dispensationalist with a hyper dispensationalist is akin to comparing a traditional post millennial to a modern prederist. There is a huge gulf.
Oh I will happily agree with you FRiend, Bur in eschatology (as with denominations), we are all stuck with our crazies. Dual-cov dispys and Hyper-dispys are Dispys all the same... It sucks when you have to label yourself 'orthodox' to distinguish your beliefs, but that is probably where you are now... You can try to lump them together and start calling them dipsy-dispys... maybe that'll catch on. ; )
And btw, you need not explain yourself to me. I know where you are.