[CynicalBear]

>>I also notice these threads end up being more about Darby and how wrong he was and how wrong dispensationalism is. The prederist presentation is about “proving” others wrong without presenting an independent theory standing on its own internal and external evidence.<<

Of course. The Preterist view, whether partial or full, has so many holes in it they can’t stand up to history. They have to allegorize much of scripture which most often gets them in opposition to other scripture which they then have to ignore or allegorize again.

[dartuser]

The Preterist view, whether partial or full, has so many holes in it they can’t stand up to history.

Preterism is the easiest eschatological system to dispense with ... but they scream the loudest so we must always deal with them.