Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: michaelmas
[H]e did say the poor in spirit would

In fact, just poor. "In spirit" is the adjective of "blessed" in Matthew, it is not their in Luke's Gospel. Of course, it is not a way to sort out the saved and the condemned (see Matthew 25 second half for that), but combined with the "eye of the needle" pericope, it is quite clear that wealth is an impediment to salvation, and poverty assists it.

On your previous post, I agree. I love Rush, he did more than any living individual to popularize conservative ideas, but subtlety of thought is not his strength. He should stick to GOP propaganda and leave matters of faith to people who practice it.

111 posted on 12/06/2013 5:23:02 PM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: annalex

Good points. I would say that being poor removes an obstacle to the practice of virtue. Having wealth on the other hand provides a different opportunity for the practice of virtue.

Yes, I’m a conservative, generally I’m for the free market, I listen to Rush and vote Republican, usually, and I’d like for he and Palin and the rest to stick to defending religous liberty rather than telling us Catholics how to interpret our Holy Father.


112 posted on 12/08/2013 8:02:15 PM PST by michaelmas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson