Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Priest says he's been shunned, fired for discussing sex abuse
CambridgeTimes.ca ^ | 10/30/2013 | Andy Blatchford

Posted on 11/01/2013 12:34:18 PM PDT by Dr. Thorne

MONTREAL - A Roman Catholic priest says his attempt to raise the issue of sexual abuse with colleagues resulted in him being ostracized and eventually fired from a famous Montreal church.

The story told by Rev. Andre Samson suggests that the Vatican's promises of a new, more open approach to dealing with sexual crimes has not necessarily translated through the church rank-and-file.

(Excerpt) Read more at cambridgetimes.ca ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: catholic; coverup; pedophilia; sexualabuse
Can't be. The sexual abuse and pedophilia problem has been cleaned up in the Catholic church. /sarcasm
1 posted on 11/01/2013 12:34:19 PM PDT by Dr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne
Can't be. The sexual abuse and pedophilia problem has been cleaned up in the Catholic church. /sarcasm

they did a far better job of it than did their Protestant counterparts who have done NOTHING

2 posted on 11/01/2013 3:44:05 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne

The part that puzzles me about this priest is, after supposedly hearing what he heard in confession, what was he hoping could be gained by re-telling this alleged anonymous sexual abuse to other priests––or anyone for that matter? Quite frankly I have a difficult time believing any part of this story.

Catholics who go to confession know that the seal of confession protects them from anything that is revealed, so why not name the priest and parish? Why cover it up? It wasn’t like he was testifying in a court of law. But even if he failed to mention the name of the priest and parish when he confessed whatever the sin that gave rise to the existence of some sexual contact with another priest, what was the confessors purpose of pressing the penitent for the names of the parish and priest who was the alleged abuser? The confessor wouldn’t be able to do anything with the information anyhow. I suppose the penitent could have volunteered that it all happened and then, after doing so, exclaim that he wasn’t going to divulge any critical information. That’s possible, I suppose, but very unlikely.

The reaction of his fellow priests also seems implausible. No doubt they reasoned, as I have, that the priest was making it all up. But why he would want to go to so much effort to make all this up and then publicize these events, is a conundrum. Perhaps he heard footsteps about an ongoing investigation and decided this might serve as a defense, of sorts, but that is mere speculation on my part, not knowing any of the timelines. Nevertheless, knowing only, what I’ve read in this very sympathetic article about the events surrounding this priest, I’m sure I’d be at least cautious in hiring him for anything.


3 posted on 11/01/2013 5:30:27 PM PDT by tomsbartoo (St Pius X watch over us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson