Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/30/2013 6:01:49 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marshmallow
Or just dispense with the civil licensing entirely.

The state's goal is to destroy marriage.

Ours should be to destroy the state's say in the matter.

2 posted on 09/30/2013 6:06:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Religious faith in government is far crazier than religious faith in God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

Better yet, take vows in the Church and forget the state license.

That is what Christians should do in the U.S. now. The state doesn’t recognize our definition of marriage, then why buy into theirs? Especially given the punitive tax laws against married couples.


3 posted on 09/30/2013 6:07:35 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

Catholicism is no different than any other huge religious, social govt system i.e. Islam. The Catholics rounded up and burned, true born again children of God, at the stake hundreds of years ago, as the truth threatened their establishment. Muzzies doing the same thing, only difference is they are still doing it today.


7 posted on 09/30/2013 6:15:24 AM PDT by eak3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow
Actually just the opposite was the basis for marriage "entries" not "marriage licenses" in Britain.

Then "marriage entries" morphed into "marriage licenses" just to make money for the state.

viz= There never was any such thing as a "marriage license" in order to get married. It was an invention of the British state to change "marriage entries" to "marriage licenses" to get revenues.

"Marriage Records

Marriage entries recorded the date and place of marriage. Information included the ages of the two parties, their residences, marital status, occupations, fathers, and even their fathers' occupations.

Civil copies of marriage entries are duplicates of original church entries.

Thus, since it was the duty of the minister to forward copies of all of the marriages he performed, the vast majority have been recorded at the civil level, even in the early years of civil registration.

However, always be sure to check the original church record since there are often discrepancies between the civil and ecclesiastical copies of the same record. Clerical errors happen! We blogged about this recently."

http://www.progenealogists.com/greatbritain/englishcivilregistration.htm

16 posted on 09/30/2013 6:58:42 AM PDT by bunkerhill7 (("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

For the elderly in the US, this would work just fine.

A sacramental wedding instead of a civil one, would prevent the loss of pension benefits for widows.


24 posted on 09/30/2013 9:18:44 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson