The big bang idea is bad physics and bad theology rolled into a package. The idea of a supposedly omniscient God suddenly deciding it would be a cool thing to do to create a universe while the idea had nevr occurred to him previously, is basically just as idiotic as the idea of the mass of the universe being collapsed to a point and then banging its way out of the point. It doesn’t even matter whether this happened 6000 or 16,000,000,000 years ago, it’s still idiotic.
The idea of a supposedly omniscient God “suddenly deciding it would be a cool thing to do to”
says who, that G-d decided it would be a “cool thing”; from where (not the Bible) do you get than notion
“while the idea had nevr occurred to him previously”
again, says who; where in the bible or in science does it say there was no universe before the present one??? no where
“is basically just as idiotic as the idea of the mass of the universe being collapsed to a point and then banging its way out of the point”
what we don’t understand can always sound idiotic
The big bang idea is bad physics and bad theology rolled into a package.
“Previously’? LOL
I’m sure God will want to check-in with you before doing it again.
I’m not disagreeing with you, I’ simply asking:
When G_d said “Let there be light!”, what would that event “look” like? Would it appear as if a light-switch were turned on to expose things as they already were - or was it the beginning of something new?
In that the universe appears to be expanding, it seems logical that matter has a point of origin - something “new”.