Sure. The "Big Bang" idea is a bumch of BS just like evolution. Having all the mass of the universe collapsed to a point would be the mothr of all black holes; nothing would ever "bang" its way out of that.
For that matter, all the idea was ever based on was the mistaken notion of interpreting cosmic redshift as universal expaansion, and Halton Arp has pretty much put that one to rest.
There is a story about a horseless carriage being shown to a peasant for the first time. “Inside the carriage,” insisted the peasant, “Is a very small, powerful horse because there’s no such thing as a horseless carriage!”
Insisting on the Big Bang theory is like that peasant because some just can’t accept the idea of something from nothing.
As a “literalist”, I have no problem with a big bang per se. When G_d said “Let there be light!”, what would that event “look” like?
That all matter has some central origin - the “bang point” - seems logical enough...
Why doesn't a hydrogen atom collapse into a neutral particle? The electromagnetic force is much stronger than gravity.
Could you be more specific.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach