So. Classify Jesus Christ as but a prophet and then justify killing him? Is that a fair summation?
Rabbi Rudomin said that chrstianity claims among other things that J*sus was a prophet. This is true. He points out that the Torah prescribes the death penalty for false prophets and for people who try to seduce Jews from the Torah. This is also true.
At the time of J*sus' death the Sanhedrion had exiled itself from the Chamber of Hewn Stones and could not carry out capital punishment. J*sus was actually put to death by the Romans, although (what a coincidence!) the method resulted in death by strangulation (heneq) which is precisely the penalty for this activity.
Why can't chrstians understand that the Torah came before the "new testament" and that Jews were bound to the former rather than the latter? This notion of the antecedence of J*sus to the Torah is a defect of thinking.
Had you rather J*sus not "died for your sins?" Was that a bad thing?
Some people who are really modern and up-to-date on Genesis can be awfully reactionary on other issues.