Stick to your day job.
I noticed you breezily dismiss “the gap theory” with “The text did not say,” then almost immediately cite Morris for alternative translation.
Missing such a contradiction could be simple over site; defending it would be intellectual dishonesty.
What contradiction? I didn’t “beezily dismiss the gap” I simply cited one of the reasons why I don’t accept it/ Furthermore I cited Morris , not for an alternative translation but because his discussion of the Spirit moving was interesting to me, and to other readers I am sure.