Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge; AnAmericanMother; Boogieman
“since the books were clearly in question for many centuries” No, they were not.

As you have already been shown, the fact is that while the apocrypha was generally accepted, debate and doubts about books continued right into Trent, and until then there was no infallible, indisputable canon for Luther to and some RCs to dissent from.

Meanwhile, the EOs and other Catholics have a different canon than Rome's but that never seems to be much of problem with RCs.

That said, i would say the wisdom of Solomon , if it was indeed written prior to the resurrection, seems to come close to being inspired of God, though apparently falsely attributed to Solomon.

47 posted on 04/03/2013 7:02:57 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: daniel1212

“until then there was no infallible, indisputable canon”

Were they included in Gutenberg’s bible?


68 posted on 04/03/2013 7:51:12 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson