To: SeekAndFind
Science doesn’t have much to say about religion. It can describe the mechanism behind how stars are created, but not the identity of the creator of that mechanism.
3 posted on
03/26/2013 9:00:57 AM PDT by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
To: allmendream
"Science doesn’t have much to say about religion. It can describe the mechanism behind how stars are created, but not the identity of the creator of that mechanism."
This is to be expected given that science is limited to the empirical while reality isn't.
To: allmendream
Science doesn’t have much to say about religion. It can describe the mechanism behind how stars are created, but not the identity of the creator of that mechanism. Exactly.
The center piece of Christianity is the life, death and resurrection Jesus. Science has no more to say on the on the events of the life of Jesus than any other historical figure. IOW, science can't confirm George Washington lived. Nor Plato or any other figure.
6 posted on
03/26/2013 9:17:47 AM PDT by
Gamecock
( If we distort the gospel, that distortion will influence and affect everything else that we believe)
To: allmendream
Science doesn’t have much to say about religion.
Perhaps quantum mechanics is a baby step in that direction, a first peek into a realm where we find supernatural ghosts in the atom, as were all previous discoveries, marching toward the ultimate understanding of existence and our place in it.
Is God and religion waiting at the end of the line? I can think of no good reason to insist that science remain godless forever. Maybe it's just the skeptics destined path.
12 posted on
03/26/2013 9:34:21 AM PDT by
ZX12R
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson