Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator
It's the same issue which arose when Copernicus challenged the commonly-held belief that the earth was the center of the universe and did not move, while the sun, planets, and stars revolved around the earth. When Copernicus' book was published, Luther and Calvin rejected his theory as contrary to the Scriptures. The Catholic Church eventually condemned his book but not until about 70 years later. Nowadays no one has any trouble accepting that the earth is a planet revolving around the sun and rotating on its axis.

Galileo said, "The Bible teaches us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go."

12 posted on 02/07/2013 7:46:49 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus
It's the same issue which arose when Copernicus challenged the commonly-held belief that the earth was the center of the universe and did not move, while the sun, planets, and stars revolved around the earth. When Copernicus' book was published, Luther and Calvin rejected his theory as contrary to the Scriptures.

Yeah, what did that dumb Polack know anyway? ;)

13 posted on 02/07/2013 7:49:22 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus

The Earth-centric model fit the available data better than the heliocentric model. So if at the time you purely looked at the data you would have to have rejected Copernicus.

Also Copernicus clung to the superstitious idea that orbits were perfect circles.


16 posted on 02/07/2013 8:04:55 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson