Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Rashputin
Given the fact that the majority of those who claim to be Christian in this country don't see anything wrong with murdering infants with contraceptives, this guy probably really can't understand why so many pro-Life people “so often coach their actions in the garb of faith”.

I see a world of difference between preventing life by whatever means, and intentionally destroying it. I've had two babies; I did not commit murder by using measures to avoid getting pregnant again.

19 posted on 02/05/2013 4:35:48 AM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom
"I did not commit murder by using measures to avoid getting pregnant again. "

Depending on the type of contraception, maybe you didn't maybe you did.

While a lot of people apparently don't know the facts, the most commonly used contraceptives do regularly kill an already formed infant by keeping it from attaching and remaining in the womb. The failure to keep fertilization from happening in the first place is common enough that every year at least twice as many** infants die due to contraceptive caused miscarrage at a very early date as do from abortions.

Until the 1930s, every Christian church, not just Catholic Church, taught that contraception was a sin even if they did not fully agree with the same strict definitions and standards the Catholic Church has always taught. Now, the Catholic Church is almost alone in teaching against all forms of contraception although with Jerry Falwell leading the way, in the early eighties the SBC did make it clear that Southern Baptists should only rely on contraceptives that prevent fertilization, not those that prevent an already conceived infant from remaining in the womb

Catholic teach what they've taught for two thousand years, but non-Catholics Christians need to ask themself a couple of simple questions. First, was their church was being led by the Scripture and Holy Spirit for the hundreds of years between Luther and the 1930s, or are they being led by Scripture and the Holy Spirit now that they teach the exact opposite. Second, when contraception methods are avilable that are just as effective and not abortifacient, how can they justify using methods that actually do kill already cnceived infants.

** "If Christian couples in your church are using the following listed “birth control” chemicals or devices, you can be certain that conceived human beings – as precious in God’s eyes as you or I – are dying in your congregation. “The Pill,” Norplant, Depo-Provera, and the IUD are commonly used “birth control” methods by women in the world and the church alike. These chemicals are known to be abortifacient drugs. They allow for a phenomenon known “break through ovulation.” Instead of “preventing pregnancy,” these drugs often allow fertilization. At that moment, a human being is conceived. The drugs then make the woman’s womb hostile to that child. Instead of implanting and growing, the child is rejected and starved – she or he dies and is expelled.

By these methods, an estimated 10 million children die each year in the U.S.!"

From http://www.lifeandlibertyministries.com/archives/000362.php

23 posted on 02/05/2013 8:25:19 AM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson