Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: redgolum

Why would I be offended? That is what I am - I have a duty to be obedient to Papa Benedict.

“The point being is that Luther was not/is not infallible. We don’t claim that.”

You claim the bible is inerrant and at the same time use Luther’s canon. Ergo, you are followers of Luther and his teachings.


29 posted on 01/22/2013 11:21:07 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge; ArrogantBustard
Traditionally, in North America (an important caveat), “Lutheran” means those synods who came from the original Reformation that hold as their base teachings the Book of Concord and the Augsburg Confession.

In Germany and other Baltic states, those synods are often called “Evangelical”. They do not often call themselves Lutheran. In some places that is a slur on the level of “Papist”, and “Fisheater”. In most of North America (NA), that isn't the case.

JCB, I suggest you research the Lutheran (using the NA term) canon pre WWI. My great uncle's Bible has the same books you do included in the Apocrypha. In confirmation, we got most of the books as separate handouts (excluding Tobit, if I remember right. Didn't have time for it).

And saying you follow BXVI to some here will get screams. During WWI, Wilson forcibly changed the Lutheran canon and liturgy to match that of the Episcopal churches.

35 posted on 01/22/2013 11:30:36 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson