Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has modern Christianity formed a new Church? [vanity]

Posted on 01/10/2013 9:33:42 AM PST by MeOnTheBeach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: Biggirl
what took place back then was the “worsT” example of when Christian brother fought against Christian brother.

Thats disputable -- I'd put it in the top 3 yes, along with the Crimean War and the Siege of Vienna

in MY mind the worst was the Crimean war -- willingly two major Christian powers allied themselves with a Moslem power against a Christian power. That was utterly despicable.

61 posted on 01/11/2013 4:33:20 AM PST by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I think that war, the Crimean war was started over the issue of the Church of the Nativity of Jesus, the site where Jesus was born. This is the shrine where the “star” is located.


62 posted on 01/11/2013 5:02:55 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kidd
The Catholic Church doesn't recognize protestant marriages.

Untrue. Strictly speaking, we "recognize" all marriages, as long as both parties are actually capable of marrying. (We don't recognize divorce, so divorced-and-remarried folks fail the "capable of marrying" test.). A marriage between two Hindus is "recognized" by the Church, but it's a "natural marriage", not a sacramental one.

A marriage between two validly-baptized Christians is recognized as a sacrament. Since most Protestants are validly baptized, most Protestant marriages (again, where both parties are capable of marrying according to the church) are recognized as sacramental, just as the marriage of two Catholics would be.

What you may be thinking of is the Church law which does not recognize a marriage contracted by a Catholic in a non-Catholic ceremony without church permission.

63 posted on 01/11/2013 5:57:47 AM PST by Campion ("Social justice" begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; Tzar

A civil wedding between two validly-baptized Protestants (with no living ex-spouses, etc.) would be both valid and sacramental. A civil wedding involving a Catholic would not be.


64 posted on 01/11/2013 6:04:48 AM PST by Campion ("Social justice" begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Campion; kidd
Strictly speaking, we "recognize" all marriages, as long as both parties are actually capable of marrying.

Given the extreme perversity of XXI Century America, I suppose it has to be said that of the two parties proposing to marry, one only must be male and one only must be female. Two male individuals, or two female individuals, cannot marry each other. The acceptance and celebration of such perversion in some parts of what might loosely be called Christendom is an act of apostasy and a huge barrier to Christian unity.

65 posted on 01/11/2013 6:09:27 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

Right. To be perfectly clear, both parties must be capable of marrying (in the abstract) and also capable of marrying each other. Any grouping other than one man and one woman fails the latter test.


66 posted on 01/11/2013 6:16:41 AM PST by Campion ("Social justice" begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
yes. It's a horrible fact that in Jerusalem you'll see the worse, unholy bickering.

But the Crimean war appalls me because 2 western powers used Christianity as a pretext to fight alongside the Moslems AGAINST Christians.

no wonder Orthodox see a madness -- and I agree with them

67 posted on 01/11/2013 8:01:09 AM PST by Cronos (Middle English prest, priest, Old English pruost, Late Latin presbyter, Latin presbuteros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Campion; Tzar

Campion — thanks for clarifying. I, of course, was thinking of two Catholics only, because I remember that there was a guy who got a civil marriage here in Poland, had a kid, then divorced and still got a Church marriage. In the eyes of the Church I guess he was unmarried and the other “purely civil union” marriage was not valid.


68 posted on 01/11/2013 8:02:58 AM PST by Cronos (Middle English prest, priest, Old English pruost, Late Latin presbyter, Latin presbuteros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

That is why for years, until the time of Blessed JPII and now with Pope BXVI, the Orthodox are slowly begining to have what looks like fruitfull talks.


69 posted on 01/11/2013 8:15:37 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson