Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake

“King James did have a very questionable personal life. but he was not directly involved in doing the translating.”

Indeed. In retrospect, I wish they had named the translation something along the lines of “The Royal English Bible” or “The English Reformation Bible” instead. That way, it would take some focus off who happened to be the monarch at the time.


8 posted on 12/31/2012 9:52:40 AM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: ReformationFan
The true Bible of the Reformation in England was the Geneva Bible.

The Puritans and the Nonconformists did not fully embrace the KJV until after the Restoration.

The KJV is really "The Anglican Bible" since it was translated to be appealing to proto-High, Low and Broad Church factions in the C of E.

Andrewes (High), Rainolds (Low) and Barlow (Broad) were a very representative cross-section.

14 posted on 12/31/2012 10:29:55 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Officially, it is the “Authorized Version.”

The “King James” title evidently arouse informally and was adopted by convention; I don’t think it is considered an official title.


19 posted on 12/31/2012 11:57:17 AM PST by Erasmus (Zwischen des Teufels und des tiefen, blauen Meers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan; wideawake; Erasmus
It is named the King James Authorized version, because King James authorized that this translation was the one to be published. Yes there were other translations at the time, some of them in English, but this was the one that was authorized during his reign.
29 posted on 12/31/2012 8:08:05 PM PST by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson