As we all can see, BroJoe is deeply confused about all things, especially ‘scientific’ terms.
The word Science surely doesn’t belong in any discussion of evolution, the religion of the willfully ignorant.
BroJoe’s arrogance and ignorance (a pair that never seem to part) are now well known in this forum, and no longer need be noted. We shall save bandwidth henceforth by simply assuming their consstant presence.
Well, as has been noted, I am just totally cornfused. I’m going to sit here and chew a little tobaccy and let the cityfolk have at it. Later on I’ll handle a rattlesnake, brush my tooth, and head off to bed.
Sorry FRiend, but you are deluded by thinking that scientific terms mean whatever you wish they might have meant, instead of what real scientists intend.
editor-surveyor: "The word Science surely doesn’t belong in any discussion of evolution, the religion of the willfully ignorant."
Sorry, but basic evolution is a confirmed scientific theory, supported by many valid observations and predictions.
Along side basic evolution theory (descent with modifications and natural selection) are many as yet unconfirmed scientific hypotheses, for example, about the origin of life itself on earth.
Yes, some of these hypotheses have been weakly confirmed (i.e., abiotic formation of organic chemicals), but none has yet achieved the status of confirmed theory.
And that's exactly how science is supposed to work, which makes science the opposite of religion.
editor-surveyor: "BroJoe’s arrogance and ignorance (a pair that never seem to part) are now well known..."
Your own arrogance and ignorance would need no comment, if you didn't strut it so blatantly, FRiend.