Creationism or Evolution?

Stay Catholic .Com ^ | 2001 | Sebastian R. Fama

[editor-surveyor]

Evolution is totally refuted by all that is scientific (IE objectively and completely examined).

You abuse the word science in your every utterance.

Were there any evidence for evolution, it would be plastered on every signboard on Earth, but, alas, there is none to post, so discussions of fragments of bones and teeth shall have to suffice.

[BroJoeK]

editor-surveyor: "Evolution is totally refuted by all that is scientific (IE objectively and completely examined)."

Such a statement of breath-taking falseness, an honest person would never dare utter.
It can only conceivably achieve a thin patina of truthfulness if you redefine the word "science" to mean: "that which comports to editor-surveyor's religious beliefs."

But -- and here we get into your issues of "ignorance and arrogance" -- in reality, science is what scientists define it as, not what those who hate science would have us believe of it.

That's why I have argued from the beginning that you are entitled to believe whatever you wish, so long as you don't call said beliefs "science".
On the other hand, if you do wish to call them "science", then they must be in accord with what science actually teaches.
Yours are not, of course.

editor-surveyor: "Were there any evidence for evolution, it would be plastered on every signboard on Earth, but, alas,..."

In fact, evidence is everywhere to be seen by those scientists who wish to see it.
But, alas, for those whose religious beliefs prevent them from seeing scientific evidence, obviously no such evidence will ever be found.