Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

Well, there is a difference in recording historic events and expressing doctrine. But your point is taken.


23 posted on 08/12/2012 2:29:19 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude
I was exaggerating a little ;-). I think my main point is that human beings don't need to be told that we derive sensual pleasure from sex. Duh! What we need, and what we find in our religion, is guidance that places our nature desire in a context in which our sexual relationship can rise above simple mammalian copulation.

To the extent that our analysis emphasizes "It's good because it feels good," without considering a purpose built into our creation, we're likely to go astray.

28 posted on 08/12/2012 2:52:48 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("You're screwed, losers. Steyn 2012!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson