Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This is similar to a Salon article posted: See But I’m a good Mormon wife: Sean and I had the perfect life. Then his faith started to crumble...

There were NUMEROUS comments to the fact that Salon published that piece...I wonder if those same posters will come on here to complain that the Mormon church is publishing pieces about people leaving their church???

Here's a thread from Saturday -- also about Mormons finding conflict within their church about their beliefs: Different takes on Mormon faith from Republican rivals [Mormon exodus underway]

*************************

From the official Lds church publication: ...the opportunity to seek a celestial marriage is still right in front of me; ...I have realized that either I can focus on what my husband’s choices have taken from our temple marriage, or I can strive even more to develop a celestial relationship with him...

How important is it for a Mormon woman to have a "celestial marriage?"

Well, per Mormonism, 'tis the very difference between living forever in the presence of Heavenly Father -- or not.
'Tis the very difference between living forever as husband and wife -- or not.
'Tis the very difference between living as a goddess and god managing your own planet -- or not.
'Tis the very difference between living forever with your children, grand-children, great grand-children, etc. -- or not.
'Tis the very difference of giving birth to billions of spirit children (what Lds call "eternal increase") on your own planet -- or not.

Don't believe me? (Then review the quotes in the next post)

For a related post, see what Mormon official teachings say about unmarrieds: The Latter-day Saint Concept of Marriage [Unmarrieds 'not whole...complete' - per Mitt's profs]:

'...the unmarried person is NOT a whole person, is NOT complete'


1 posted on 08/05/2012 12:37:21 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Colofornian
This tears it.

I am obviously morally obligated to vote for the Muslim.

2 posted on 08/05/2012 12:39:51 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the collectivists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

A FEW of the 'Conditions' Mormons Place on Living Forever in Heavenly Father's Presence

Condition #1: Be Married [Singles need not apply****]

Sources:

* "To be exalted in the highest degree and continue eternally in family relationships, we MUST enter into 'the new and everlasting covenant of marriage' and be true to that covenant. In other words, temple marriage is a requirement for obtaining the highest degree of celestial glory." (True to the Faith, p. 93, 2004)

* "Brethren, please remember: The highest degree of glory is available to you only through that order of the priesthood linked to the new and everlasting covenant of marriage" (Lds "apostle" Russell M. Nelson, "Honoring the Priesthood" Ensign (Conference Edition), May 1993, p. 40

* "LDS doctrine teaches that there is a Mother in Heaven as well as a Father, that Eve's eating of the forbidden fruit furthered God's Plan of Salvation (see Fall of Adam), that women must perform certain essential priesthood ordinances in the temple, and that the highest order of the priesthood and the complete blessings of exaltation are available only to the married couple; neither can enter exaltation without the other" (Encylopedia of Mormonism 2:490)

In other words, being that "exaltation" & the "celestial" kingdom are the ONLY degrees of glory in which a person can live together with Heavenly Father

Condition #2: Uphold your husband as your 'Lord'

Source: "Do you uphold your husband before God as your lord? 'What!--my husband to be my lord?' I ask, Can you get into the celestial kingdom without him? Have any of you been there? You will remember that you never got into the celestial kingdom without the aid of your husband...No woman will get into the celestial kingdom, except her husband receives her, if she is worthy to have a husband; and if not, somebody will receive her as a servant" (Lds "apostle" Erastus Snow, Oct. 4, 1857, JoD 5:291)

Condition #3: Treat Eternal monogamy and Eternal polygamy as 'one of the most important doctrines revealed to man in any age of the world' -- IF you want to become 'gods,' that is

Lds “prophet” Joseph F. Smith:
*...this doctrine of the eternal union of the husband and wife and of plural marriage, is one of the most important doctrines ever revealed to man in any age of the world. Without it man would come to a full stop; without it we never could be exalted to associate with and become gods neither could we attain to the power of eternal increase... (Joseph F. Smith, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 21, pp. 9-10)

Lds "prophet" Joseph Fielding Smith (a different "prophet" than Joseph F. Smith):
* So if you want to enter into exaltation and become as God, that is a son of God or a daughter of God, and receive a fulness of the kingdom, then you have got to abide in his law-not merely the law of marriage but all that pertains to the new and everlasting covenant... (Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, Vol. II, p. 63)

Why the **** in Condition #1 sub-title above?

Well, to help answer that, see this a related post where you can see what Mormon official teachings say about unmarrieds: The Latter-day Saint Concept of Marriage [Unmarrieds 'not whole...complete' - per Mitt's profs]:

'...the unmarried person is NOT a whole person, is NOT complete'

Thruout the 1960s, Hugh B. Brown was part of the ultimate 'First Presidency of Mormon hierarchy...Where Brown described unmarrieds as above

In July 2011, the LDS Ensign edited out those key dozen words in this graph: "The Latter-day Saints believe that in order to attain the best in life and the greatest happiness in this world and for the next, men and women must be married in the temple for time and eternity. Without the sealing ordinances of temple marriage, man cannot achieve a godlike stature or receive a fulness of joy. …"

So where did Brown -- one of the three highest-ranking Lds hierarchists thruout the 1960s -- specifically address "unmarrieds" there?

The original paragraph was published by Bookcraft, Inc. (Salt Lake City) in 1960, when Brown wrote "You and Your Marriage"...One chapter (pp. 12-19 of that book) focused on "The Latter-Day Saint Concept of Marriage." This chapter was later lifted to be included as a chapter in a 1968 book published by Deseret Book Company, owned by the Mormon church. That book, The Latter-day Saint Family: A Book of Selected Readings, was compiled/edited by Dr. Blaine R. Porter, Professor of Child Development and Family Relationships @ BYU. [Porter was a prof during the few years that Mitt Romney attended BYU]

When you turn to p. 198 of the book published by Deseret and edited by BYU prof Porter, we see the dozen words that the Ensign editors edited out in 2011: Allow me to cite the entire graph as published by Brown in 1960 and by Deseret Book Company in 1968 [the missing dozen words are bold-faced]: The Latter-day Saints believe that in order to attain the best in life and the greatest happiness in this world and for the next, men and women must be married in the temple for time and eternity. Without the sealing ordinances of temple marriage, man cannot achieve a godlike stature or receive a fulness of joy because the unmarried person is NOT a whole person, is NOT complete."

Do you hear that unmarrieds? Do you hear that singles?

The Mormon church was teaching throughout the 1960s (1960-1968) that unmarrieds were NOT whole people...NOT complete people!!!!

***************************************

Since Lds teach about '3 degrees of glory,' how do we know Lds teachings allow only the top degree to live with Heavenly Father'?

Lds 'scripture' Doctrines & Covenants excerpted verses from chapter 76:

Note as you read about "church of the Firstborn": Lds says this title applies ONLY to the mainstream Lds church...Per both D&C 1:30 and this note by a BYU professor:

“Exaltation is the greatest of all the gifts and attainments possible. It is available ONLY in the highest degree of the Celestial Kingdom and is RESERVED for members of the Church of the Firstborn. This exalted status, called eternal life, is available to be received by a man and a wife. It means not only living in God’s presence, but receiving power to do as God does, including the power to bear children after the resurrection.” (Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 2:479)

Doctrines & Covenants 76:
54 They are they who are the church of the Firstborn.
55 They are they into whose hands the Father has given all things—
56 They are they who are priests and kings, who have received of his fulness, and of his glory;
57 And are priests of the Most High, after the order of Melchizedek, which was after the order of Enoch, which was after the order of the Only Begotten Son.
58 Wherefore, as it is written, they are gods, even the sons of God—
59 Wherefore, all things are theirs, whether life or death, or things present, or things to come, all are theirs and they are Christ’s, and Christ is God’s.
60 And they shall overcome all things.
...62 These shall dwell in the presence of God and his Christ forever and ever.
... 92 And thus we saw the glory of the celestial, which excels in all things—where God, even the Father, reigns upon his throne forever and ever;
...94 They who dwell in his presence are the church of the Firstborn
...95 And he makes them equal [to Himself] in power, and in might, and in dominion

NOTE: Clarification: The following verses are about the so-called Mormon "Terrestrial" world -- the supposed "middle" degree of glory where honest Christians and the like are supposed to be able to go...note that they won't receive "the fulness of the Father" -- which Mormon general authorities teach means "never" being able to live in Heavenly Father's presence:

D&C 76:
...71 And again, we saw the terrestrial world, and behold and lo, these are they who are of the terrestrial, whose glory differs from that of the church of the Firstborn who have received the fulness of the Father
...77 These are they who receive of the presence of the Son, but not of the fulness of the Father.

NOTE: Clarification: The following verses are about the so-called Mormon 'Telestial' world -- the supposed "lowest" degree of glory...in which consists people sent to a temporary "hell" -- a sort of spirit prison...these people will supposedly be offered the Mormon "gospel" by spirit missionaries as a sort of "get out of eternal jail" card: D&C 76:
...102 Last of all, these all are they who will not be gathered with the saints, to be caught up unto the church of the Firstborn, and received into the cloud.
103 These are they who are liars, and sorcerers, and adulterers, and whoremongers, and whosoever loves and makes a lie.
104 These are they who suffer the wrath of God on earth.
105 These are they who suffer the vengeance of eternal fire.
106 These are they who are cast down to hell and suffer the wrath of Almighty God, until the fulness of times, when Christ shall have subdued all enemies under his feet...
...109 But behold, and lo, we saw the glory and the inhabitants of the telestial world, that they were as innumerable as the stars in the firmament of heaven, or as the sand upon the seashore...
...112 And they shall be servants of the Most High; but where God and Christ dwell they cannot come, worlds without end. .

How have Lds general authorities interpreted D&C 76?

8th Lds 'prophet' George Albert Smith:
"There are some people who have supposed that if we are quickened telestial bodies that eventually, throughout the ages of eternity, we will continue to progress until we will find our place in the celestial kingdom, but the scriptures and revelations of God have said that those who are quickened telestial bodies CANNOT COME where God and Christ dwell, worlds without end." (Conference Report, October 1945, p.172)

'ONLY THE CELESTIAL IS THE KINGDOM OF GOD' -- BYU prof

BYU Prof Daniel H. Ludlow, A Companion to Your Study of the New Testament, p. 311:
"There are, of course, three kingdoms of glory to which resurrected persons will go--the celstial, terrestrial, and telestial...Of these three, ONLY the celestial is the kingdom of God; it is the kingdom RESERVED for the saints who obey the laws and ordinances of the gospel. Great hosts of persons will go to the other kingdoms and hence will not attain salvation in the full gospel sense."

Ludlow also addressed this in editing the Encyclopedia of Mormonism 1:368: "The Celestial Kingdom is RESERVED for those who receive a testimony of...
[the Mormon]
...Jesus and fully embrace the [Mormon] gospel; that is, they have faith in Jesus Christ, repent of their sins, are baptized by immersion by one having authority
[only in the Mormon church],
receive the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands
[only Mormon priesthood hands],
and endure in righteousness. All who attain this kingdom 'shall dwell in the presence of God and his Christ forever and ever (D&C 76:62)."

3 posted on 08/05/2012 12:44:02 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
From the article: ...my husband just didn’t believe in the gospel anymore. He didn’t even know if God really existed.

Not only is the "Mormon gospel" NOT good news (it's legalism thru and thru), but for you Mormons who have stopped believing in the Mormon god...have you ever thought that perhaps it was the Mormon vision of the Mormon god that turned you off to him?

(Perhaps the problem isn't simply with you)

I mean...I'm an "athiest" when it comes to believing in the Mormon god as well...

Why should we believe in...
...one god who is but among thousands/millions/billions? [When even the Book of Mormon never taught that?]
...a flesh-and-body man living on another planet (Mormon Doctrine, p. 321) who got the "god job" -- as Lds teach that a "council of gods" appointed the "god of this planet."
...a god who was ne'er divine going back to eternal past?
...a god who even sinned?
...a creature-god who "died" due to his sin?

In comparison, have you examined closely THE Ultimate God of the Bible?

(I'll document some of the above in posts that follow)

6 posted on 08/05/2012 12:47:56 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

Wow, sounds just like Mother Theresa’s problems.


7 posted on 08/05/2012 12:48:10 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (....The days are long, but the years are short.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

Is this on the religious forum?

Is the aim to point out Romney’s religious heresy?


24 posted on 08/05/2012 3:32:41 PM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

What a tragic, paralyzing mishmash of legalism. No grace, no hope. Very sad.


26 posted on 08/05/2012 3:42:48 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans. Don't read their lips. Watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

Sounded like a very good story to me, it don,t matter what religion it is called it is the faith that counts, this woman knows what God expects from her.


Titus ch 2
3
The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things;

4
That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,

5
To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.


A wife like that is worth her weight in gold regardless of the religion she believes in.


32 posted on 08/06/2012 7:52:28 AM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson