Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Scottish Bishop Could See Going to Jail Over Gay 'Marriage'
Catholic News Agency ^ | 7/25/12 | David Kerr

Posted on 07/25/2012 1:49:50 PM PDT by marshmallow

Glasgow, Scotland, Jul 25, 2012 / 11:20 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Archbishop-designate Philip Tartaglia of Glasgow could see himself being imprisoned for speaking out in support of the traditional married family.

“I could see myself going to jail possibly at some point over the next 15 years, if God spares me, if I speak out,” Archbishop Tartaglia said in an interview with STV News July 24.

His comments came just a day before the Scottish government announced it would legislate in favor of same-sex “marriage.” Archbishop Tartaglia warned that the redefinition of marriage will have “enormous implications for religious liberty.”

“I am deeply concerned that today, defending the traditional meaning of marriage is almost considered ‘hate speech’ and branded intolerant. Such a response is undemocratic, closes debate and is highly manipulative,” he told CNA on July 24.

Last month the leading Scottish lawyer Aidan O’Neill warned that same-sex “marriage” legislation will radically undermine religious liberty in Scotland.

He predicted that a change in the law could result in employees being fired for opposing same-sex “marriage,” ministers and priests being sued for refusing to allow “wedding” ceremonies to take place in their churches, school children being forced to attend homosexual history lessons, and couples being rejected as foster parents if they oppose the new legislation.

Archbishop Tartaglia, 61, has been the Bishop of Paisley since 2005. Before that he served as rector of the Scots College in Rome. A native of Glasgow, he will now be the 41st successor of the city’s 7th- century founder, St. Mungo.


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; glasgow; homosexualagenda; kenyanbornmuzzie; romney; romneyagenda; romneymarriage; romneyvsclerks; scotland; swrdswllwngsdshw; unitedkingdom

1 posted on 07/25/2012 1:49:55 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
LINK to remainder of article.
2 posted on 07/25/2012 1:54:05 PM PDT by marshmallow (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
That Scotland, which has produced some of the most rational thinkers in the Anglo/Celtic world over the centuries, would legislate in favor of an Oxymoron--is very sad, indeed. The Archbishop is to be commended for trying to step into the breach of all that is rational.

This sort of lunacy is cited as an example in Cloud Dancing Revisited--A Spreading Contagion.

Unless the West finds leaders willing to actually analyze the demands of agitators, before trying to humor them, the progress of the last millennium will be lost, and we will be back to the chaos that followed the collapse of Rome.

You cannot expect a civilization to survive the continuous legislation of fantasy.

William Flax

3 posted on 07/25/2012 2:00:46 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Anthony Burgess, author of A Clockwork Orange, wrote a chilling little novel called The Wanting Seed which predicted all of this.
4 posted on 07/25/2012 2:22:15 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

“Now, since the family and human society at large spring from marriage, these men will on no account allow matrimony to be the subject of the jurisdiction of the Church. Nay, they endeavor to deprive it of all holiness, and so bring it within the contracted sphere of those rights which, having been instituted by man, are ruled and administered by the civil jurisprudence of the community. Wherefore it necessarily follows that they attribute all power over marriage to civil rulers, and allow none whatever to the Church; and, when the Church exercises any such power, they think that she acts either by favor of the civil authority or to its injury. Now is the time, they say, for the heads of the State to vindicate their rights unflinchingly, and to do their best to settle all that relates to marriage according as to them seems good.”

—Pope Leo XIII about 130 years ago.

Freegards


5 posted on 07/25/2012 2:47:51 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Not only does the redefinition of marriage have enormous ramifications, as he states, for religious liberty - but it has massive implications for family, child rearing, education....this will have a ripple effect, and the law of unintended consequences will be at play.


6 posted on 07/25/2012 6:26:25 PM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

““I am deeply concerned that today, defending the traditional meaning of marriage is almost considered ‘hate speech’ and branded intolerant. Such a response is undemocratic, closes debate and is highly manipulative,” he told CNA on July 24.”

TRUTH!


7 posted on 07/25/2012 6:27:33 PM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson