Who are you purporting to speak for when you use the pronoun we?
Are there people who don't think the general public should be exposed to these quotes and history?
Since Milt Rominy (it rhymes with hominy, the tatseless corn product) appears to be the nominee of the republican party, oppsing little barry bastard commie in the general election, a subtle but now obvious change in use of the Religion forum and the material amassed to expose the ISM has arisen, where the previous 'campaign' was about opposing the ISM but is now twsited to be used solely to attack Romney, and occasionally to impugn Mormons, the adherents to the ISM. The adherents are not our enemy, well, not in the past, because they are duped by a cult. But this distinction has been blurred for exploitative purposes and those dedicated to exposing the ISM have been duped into serving a political agenda using the religion forum.
Here's an example dug fromt he pages of the LDS inc JOurnal of Discourses, which clearly illustrates why the ISM is anit-Christian ... and I sincerely hope you see why this is not a Christian perspective being taught by the LDS inc leadership when this was collected into their precious Jof D:
"We may talk of men being redeemed by the efficacy of his [Christ's] blood; but the truth is that that blood has no efficacy to wash away our sins. That must depend upon our own action." [ LDS Apostle Amasa M. Lyman, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 7, p. 299, 1859]