“Their hatred for all that is Mormon exceeds the saving of our country, as we knew it.”
_______________________________________________
Exactly!
Funny, these people who bring up great concerns about Romney's religion and its “sinister” implications, never seem to be concerned that Obama has dissed our greatest ally in the Middle East, Israel...GOD'S CHOSEN PEOPLE, while at the same time embraced our (and Israels) enemies! I've only heard Romney speak of the Jewish people and the Nation of Israel with great respect and reverence. Buy according to these anti-Romney types, he's the bigger enemy to America!
These people are becoming seriously unhinged.
These people are "becoming seriously unhinged".It's obvious which posters are "becoming seriously unhinged" when you look at the frenzy of the responses to sourced, factual truths about mormonism!
There is no possible way for them to refute your posts, Colo...so the ad hominems are flying! THIS should drive 'em nuts!
*********************************************
The Council of Fifty and Todays Church
One might say, Maybe they dont have a Council of Fifty anymore. Perhaps they dont follow the same line of thinking anymore because they teach that a present-day prophet (the President of the Church) can supersede what former ones taught.
Each President of the Church does have the right to supercede previous doctrines, as was done in 1978 when the ban on African Americans joining the church was lifted, in what is commonly referred to as the Black Revelation. But the Kingdom of God and the Council of Fifty, along with its agenda, is something that would never be dismissed. Klaus Hansen states that since world government was to be one of the Councils primary missions, the modern-day Church leaders are not going to do away with it. (37)
However, it is correct that leaders no longer tell members how to vote in state or national elections. This came as a disappointment to many in the church. When I was a member I recall when I heard this announcement. At the time, others and myself felt very disheartened. We wanted our prophet to tell us which presidential nominee to vote for. We believed he was a recipient of heavenly revelation and would naturally know which candidate God approved of. But, even with no longer being told, we still knew that the church favored the Republican Party.
Yet, in spite of this change in policy, the Law of Common Consent, the raising of members hands to confirm those appointed within the church, is still operative today. If a Mormon dares vote contrary to church appointed leaders, claimed to have been called by revelation, he or she is called in for the dreaded interview. If the individual doesnt repent, excommunication is inevitable.
However, it is believed that at some time in the future the church will change its present policy of not telling their members what issues, or candidate they should vote for in elections. When this happens, it is believed that while members may not be told outright how to vote, it will be politely suggested. Again, no one would dare refuse. The membership will be expected to rally behind whatever issues, or candidates the leaders decide need a majority vote--and leaders can communicate their wishes within a matter of hours.
This is accomplished through a networking system, which communicate[s] messages with amazing speed. One church leader boasted that by using each local wards telephone tree, [he] can make sixteen calls, and by the end of the day 2,700 people will know something. (38)
Further, the Mormon Churchs Information Systems Division anticipates that via their satellite systems, the General Authorities [church hierarchy] will be able to notify as many as three million Church members throughout the U.S., Canada, and Mexico in less than an hour! (39)
The point is that if the Mormon Church gains any future kind of political control in the nation, the above kind of theocratic government and voting procedure will be operative.