All of a sudden, the New York Times, probably the most anti-military major newspaper in the country, who'll leak classified secrets at the drop of a hat, cares about the troops? Don't make me laugh!!
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Wow - I’ve heard of grasping at strwas before, but this could be a new low by the NYSlimes. How can one who thinks there is an actual separation of Church, which protects folks from bieng exposed to religion, claim that homosexuals being “married” as a religious “right” and be all for what God called an abomination. They also seem to be ignorant that the vast majority of military (like the vast majority of humans on earth) are not homosexual and that the military would function much more affectively, and with higher morale, if they went back to the policies before DADT.
2 posted on
05/13/2012 8:21:33 AM PDT by
trebb
("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
...If, for example, a Navy chaplain wanted to perform a same-sex wedding... Bull crap!
3 posted on
05/13/2012 8:30:09 AM PDT by
BufordP
("Drink me if you can't take a joke." --Kool-Aid)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
4 posted on
05/13/2012 8:35:02 AM PDT by
BufordP
("Drink me if you can't take a joke." --Kool-Aid)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Military does not force doctors to perform abortions at military hospitals what is the difference??
7 posted on
05/13/2012 8:44:08 AM PDT by
timlilje
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Military does not force doctors to perform abortions at military hospitals what is the difference??
8 posted on
05/13/2012 8:44:28 AM PDT by
timlilje
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Intolerance = No white flags
10 posted on
05/13/2012 10:00:54 AM PDT by
Vaduz
To: 2ndDivisionVet
How is allowing the perversion of homosexual marriage a step forward?
11 posted on
05/13/2012 10:47:57 AM PDT by
DMG2FUN
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson